History
  • No items yet
midpage
170 So. 3d 269
La. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Tenorio worked for Alpha Tech 1981–1988 at Harvey, Louisiana yards where OGR scale was cleaned from pipes and equipment.
  • The cleaning process released radioactive material, creating airborne exposure at the yards.
  • He was diagnosed with squamous carcinoma of the vocal cords in November 2009.
  • He filed suit on April 17, 2014 seeking damages from multiple oil companies for radiation exposure.
  • The trial court sustained the prescription defense, dismissed the case with prejudice, and denied new trial; the appellate court affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Latent-disease prescription and contra non valentem applicability Tenorio—contra non valentem suspends prescription; ignorance until 2013 tolls filing. Defendants—prescription ran from 2009; Tenorio failed to prove suspension. Prescription began in 2009; contra non valentem does not save the claim; affirm.
Standard of review and evidentiary burden on prescription in exception Petition alleges suspension; trial court should accept all pleading facts as true if no evidence is offered. On face of pleadings, action prescribed; plaintiff bears burden to prove suspension if prescription is facially evident. Because prescription was facially evident and no evidence supported suspension, the court affirmed the prescription ruling.

Key Cases Cited

  • Allday v. Newpark Square I Office Condo. Ass’n, 113 So.3d 346 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2013) (prescription construed in favor of maintaining obligee's claim)
  • Bailey v. Khoury, 891 So.2d 1268 (La.1 Cir. 2005) (damages accrual when injury manifests for latent-action analysis)
  • Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., 593 So.2d 351 (La.1992) (establishes accrual timing for latent injuries)
  • Loupe v. Avondale Shipyards, 470 So.2d 336 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1985) (limits contra non valentem where plaintiff's own neglect caused ignorance)
  • Bradley v. Emplrs. Ins. Co., 97 So.3d 454 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2012) (contra non valentem applicability when discovery of facts delayed)
  • In re Succession of Scurlock, 140 So.3d 318 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2014) (recognizes limited jurisprudential contra non valentem exception)
  • Herrera v. Gallegos, 128 So.3d 306 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2013) (standard for reviewing findings on prescription)
  • Cole v. Celotex Corp., 620 So.2d 1154 (La.1993) (proper accrual of damage actions under latent defect)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tenorio v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 15, 2015
Citations: 170 So. 3d 269; 14 La.App. 5 Cir. 814; 2015 WL 1786947; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 729; No. 14-CA-814
Docket Number: No. 14-CA-814
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    Tenorio v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 170 So. 3d 269