History
  • No items yet
midpage
TCF National Bank v. Richards
2016 IL App (1st) 152083
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • TCF National Bank filed a mortgage foreclosure complaint (Dec. 2013) against Christine Richards for default on a Chicago property; plaintiff sought judicial sale and an in personam deficiency.
  • Plaintiff obtained authorization to use special process servers and filed affidavits for service by publication under 735 ILCS 5/2-206(a); process servers attempted personal service multiple times at the property in December 2013 and a publication ran in January 2014.
  • Richards did not initially appear; court entered default judgment and judgment of foreclosure (May 23, 2014). A sale was scheduled for August 26, 2014 but was stayed after Richards filed an emergency motion the day before the sale.
  • Richards then filed multiple pro se motions (to quash service, to vacate, to reconsider) arguing publication/service was improper and alleging lack of personal jurisdiction; the court denied those motions and later confirmed the sale (June 25, 2015), entering a deficiency judgment of $45,752.94 against Richards.
  • Richards appealed; the appellate court reviewed de novo whether service by publication complied with statutory and local-rule requirements, whether hearings were required, timeliness of motions, and whether a 2-1401 petition was premature.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether service by publication satisfied 735 ILCS 5/2-206(a) and Cook Co. Cir. Ct. R. 7.3 Elite’s affidavits show due inquiry and repeated attempts at the only known address; publication was proper Process servers were not diligent (e.g., did not contact neighbors); plaintiff knew of municipal case showing whereabouts Service by publication was proper; affidavits demonstrated due inquiry/diligence; no evidentiary hearing required
Whether defendant preserved/jurisdictional objection by filing emergency stay without contesting jurisdiction Plaintiff: Richards waived jurisdictional objection under 735 ILCS 5/15-1505.6 by seeking relief without contesting jurisdiction Richards: continued to assert lack of personal jurisdiction and defective service Court found jurisdiction existed because service was valid and Richards’ actions (including filing an appearance) waived/failed to preserve the jurisdictional defense
Whether motions to reconsider were timely and should have been granted Plaintiff: motions untimely, raised no new facts or law; record shows proper notices and Rule 113(d) compliance Richards: court ignored affidavits and procedural defects (notice incomplete, Rule 113(d) failure) Motions to reconsider denied as untimely and without new evidence; record contradicted defendant’s claims about notice and Rule 113(d) filing
Whether 735 ILCS 5/2-1401(f) petition to vacate was properly denied Plaintiff: petition premature because final, appealable order is the order confirming the sale Richards: sought relief from judgment asserting lack of jurisdiction Petition denied as premature (filed before order confirming sale); even treated as other motion, no basis for relief because service was proper and foreclosure meritorious

Key Cases Cited

  • BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Mitchell, 2014 IL 116311 (Illinois Supreme Court) (court must have both subject-matter and personal jurisdiction for valid judgment)
  • EMC Mortgage Corp. v. Kemp, 2012 IL 113419 (Illinois Supreme Court) (foreclosure judgment not final and appealable until order approving sale and directing distribution)
  • Volpert v. Household Finance Corp. III, 227 Ill. App. 3d 453 (Ill. App. Ct.) (repeated attempts at a confirmed residence can satisfy due inquiry; no per se requirement to contact neighbors)
  • First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Brown, 74 Ill. App. 3d 901 (Ill. App. Ct.) (if defendant raises a substantial challenge to plaintiff’s affidavit, trial court should hold evidentiary hearing)
  • Public Taxi Service, Inc. v. Ayrton, 15 Ill. App. 3d 706 (Ill. App. Ct.) (service by publication is an extraordinary and least satisfactory means of notice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: TCF National Bank v. Richards
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 21, 2016
Citation: 2016 IL App (1st) 152083
Docket Number: 1-15-2083
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.