History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor B. Theunissen, MD, LLC v. United States Office of Personel Management
2:24-cv-00531
| E.D. La. | Nov 27, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff, Dr. Taylor B. Theunissen, sued as assignee of patient J.C., a federal employee who underwent breast cancer-related surgery and reconstruction covered under a health plan administered by GEHA and overseen by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
  • After J.C. assigned her benefits, Theunissen performed the procedure and submitted a claim that was allegedly underpaid by GEHA.
  • Theunissen claimed the preauthorization (precertification) letter constituted a binding contractual agreement for reimbursement at a “reasonable and customary” rate.
  • Administrative appeals were exhausted per FEHBA and OPM denied the appeal in September 2021, advising that judicial review must be sought in federal court.
  • Theunissen sued in March 2024 for judicial review (as assignee), and in his individual capacity pursued breach of contract and detrimental reliance claims under state law.
  • OPM moved to dismiss based on untimeliness of the judicial review suit and preemption of state law claims by FEHBA; motions were converted to summary judgment due to reliance on matters outside the pleadings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of judicial review claim under FEHBA Prescription period starts at final agency decision (Sept. 2021), so suit (filed in 2024) is timely Prescription period starts year care was provided (Feb. 2019), making Dec. 2022 the deadline Judicial review claim is untimely; limitations period begins year care is provided
Preemption of state law breach of contract and detrimental reliance claims Claims not preempted; based on separate contractual obligations arising from preauthorization letter FEHBA expressly preempts state law claims relating to coverage or benefits under plan State law claims are preempted by FEHBA; dismissed with prejudice

Key Cases Cited

  • Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh, 547 U.S. 677 (2006) (explains FEHBA structure, OPM’s authority, and broad FEHBA preemption)
  • Coventry Health Care of Mo., Inc. v. Nevils, 581 U.S. 87 (2017) (clarifies the expansive scope of FEHBA preemption over state law)
  • Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41 (1987) (discusses broad federal preemption for benefit plans)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor B. Theunissen, MD, LLC v. United States Office of Personel Management
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Date Published: Nov 27, 2024
Docket Number: 2:24-cv-00531
Court Abbreviation: E.D. La.