2021 Ohio 1815
Ohio Ct. App.2021Background
- Tax Ease Ohio, L.L.C. filed a 2019 tax-certificate foreclosure against Adrian Keeton and others; the county treasurer admitted an interest and Keeton timely answered denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses.
- Tax Ease moved for default judgment against nonresponding parties, sought attorney fees, and moved for summary judgment against Keeton asserting entitlement under R.C. Chapter 5721.
- Keeton opposed summary judgment, filing a sworn affidavit, the 2017 installment-plan contract, and bank records showing $377 debits to Tax Ease, asserting the debt had been paid per the installment plan.
- A magistrate granted default against nonrespondents, taxed attorney fees, and entered summary-judgment findings on March 4 (decision with written findings filed March 13) but did not address Keeton’s evidence or explain why it did not create a genuine issue.
- Keeton filed objections (and a motion for leave to expand time) relying on COVID-19 tolling and local foreclosure orders; the trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision and later denied leave as untimely.
- The appellate court held Keeton’s objections were timely under the Ohio Supreme Court and Cuyahoga County tolling/orders and reversed and remanded because the trial court erred by not considering the timely objections and the evidence they raised.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of objections to magistrate's decision given COVID tolling/local foreclosure order | Objections were untimely; Keeton waived review except for plain error | Tolling orders and local foreclosure order treated the magistrate’s March 13 filing as filed May 18, making objections timely | Objections were timely under the Ohio Supreme Court tolling and the county foreclosure order; trial court erred in refusing to consider them |
| Grant of summary judgment without addressing Keeton's affidavit, contract, and bank records | Tax Ease: it held the tax certificate, satisfied statutory prerequisites, and was entitled to judgment as a matter of law | Keeton: his sworn affidavit, installment-plan contract, and bank records created genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment | Reversed and remanded — trial court failed to consider the objected-to matters/evidence and must independently review the objections and underlying evidence |
| Default judgment and taxation of attorney fees against nonanswering parties | Magistrate properly entered default and awarded costs where parties did not respond | Keeton challenged default and fee award in his objections | Appellate opinion notes objections as timely and requires trial-court consideration of those objections (remand) |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Tolling of Time Requirements Imposed by Rules Promulgated by Supreme Court & Use of Technology, 158 Ohio St.3d 1447 (2020) (Ohio Supreme Court tolled filing deadlines and court-rule time limits during COVID emergency)
- O'Keeffe v. McClain, 158 Ohio St.3d 1478 (2020) (tolling order does not apply to court-ordered deadlines entered after March 9, 2020)
