Tarris Woods v. Rusty Legg
363 S.W.3d 710
Tex. App.2011Background
- Woods, incumbent Galveston City Councilmember, ran against Legg in District 1 runoff on June 19, 2010.
- Woods filed an election contest under Tex. Elec. Code § 221.003 alleging illegal votes, blocked voting, and other misconduct.
- Trial court held a bench trial, denied the contest, and affirmed Legg's victory.
- On appeal, Woods challenges the denial and seeks a new election, alleging misassignment of voters and prevented votes.
- Hurricane Ike displaced many residents; residency and registration issues were central to eligibility and voting procedures.
- The court applies clear-and-convincing evidence standard to determine if violations materially affected the outcome.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misassignment of voters affected outcome | Woods showed misassignment of District 1 residents to other precincts | Legg contends evidence insufficient to prove a material effect | No reversible error; evidence insufficient to show material effect on outcome. |
| Eligibility and denial of votes to named voters | Woods proves aggrieved voters were eligible but denied the vote | Legg argues absence of clear and convincing proof of improper denial | Trial court proper in denying relief; Woods failed to prove eligible-denial by clear and convincing evidence. |
| Effect of residence/registration rules on voting | Residence/registration procedures impacted eligibility | Procedures are mandatory and correctly applied | Procedures properly applied; no error in outcome related to residence/registration. |
Key Cases Cited
- Price v. Lewis, 45 S.W.3d 215 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001) (burden to show material effect of violations)
- Olsen v. Cooper, 24 S.W.3d 608 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000) (clear and convincing standard for contest)
- Slusher v. Streater, 896 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995) (material irregularities must affect results)
- In re J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2002) (standard for reviewing factual credibility in bench trials)
- City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (appellate deference to trial court credibility determinations)
- Kennelly v. Gates, 406 S.W.2d 351 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston 1966) (irregularities immaterial absent material effect)
- Speights v. Willis, 88 S.W.3d 817 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2002) (residence inquiry factors and intent)
- Mills v. Bartlett, 377 S.W.2d 636 (Tex. 1964) (residence determination factors; nexus of evidence)
- Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398 (1939) (status of residence and intentions informing domicile)
- In re Graham, 251 S.W.3d 844 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008) (statements inconsistent with actual residence are of slight weight)
- Green v. Reyes, 836 S.W.2d 203 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992) (standard for evaluating vote-count issues in elections)
