History
  • No items yet
midpage
T.D.G. v. L.R.
293 P.3d 276
Utah
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother executed a testamentary guardianship appointment giving custody to Grandparents; Goings, though not formally intervening, challenged the guardianship.
  • Goings filed an objection to the Guardianship Appointment, later treated as an intervenor under Utah code §75-5-208, establishing standing.
  • Guardianship and Paternity actions were concurrent; Goings was adjudicated as the legal father in a separate Paternity Action after Guardianship was confirmed.
  • The district court held that Goings was not a legal parent under Utah law at the time of confirmation and thus Grandparents’ guardianship was valid under the Testamentary Appointment Statute.
  • Goings appealed the denial of his motion to vacate the Guardianship Appointment; the Utah Court of Appeals certified the case to the Utah Supreme Court.
  • The Supreme Court affirmed the district court, ruling no preserved plain-error warranted reversal and that sanctions against Goings’s counsel were beyond the court’s jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing to appeal Goings had intervenor status as an objector. Grandparents contend he lacked standing as non-parent. Goings had standing; affirmed district court.
Preservation and plain error Goings preserved due process and notice arguments. Issues not preserved; no plain error. No reversible plain error; issues not preserved.
Validity under Testamentary Appointment Statute Petition lacked requirement that surviving parent be adjudged incapacitated. Statute governs testamentary appointment; no notice requirement. Petition valid; guardianship affirmed.
Custody and guardianship scope Custody could not automatically follow guardianship. Guardianship includes custody; Grandparents approved. Guardianship includes custody; no error in custody award.

Key Cases Cited

  • Pratt v. Nelson, 2007 UT 41 (Utah 2007) (preservation requirements; standard for plain error)
  • Maestas, 2012 UT 46 (Utah 2012) (statutory interpretation; guardian duties)
  • Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1983) (due process and unwed fathers' opportunity)
  • T.M. v. B.B. (In re Adoption of T.B.), 2010 UT 42 (Utah 2010) (best interests; nonpreservation caveat)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: T.D.G. v. L.R.
Court Name: Utah Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 11, 2012
Citation: 293 P.3d 276
Docket Number: No. 20100288
Court Abbreviation: Utah