Sweet v. Trost
3:18-cv-00097
S.D. Ill.May 22, 2019Background
- Plaintiff Derek Sweet, an incarcerated individual, filed a § 1983 suit (3:18-cv-00097) and proceeded to a Pavey hearing on exhaustion of administrative remedies.
- Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty concluded Sweet failed to exhaust administrative remedies, finding Sweet had received a response to his initial grievance and admitted nothing prevented him from placing grievances in the required pick-up box.
- Defendants moved for summary judgment on exhaustion; Magistrate Judge Beatty recommended granting that motion.
- Sweet objected to the Report; the district court reviewed the objections de novo and found they merely rehashed prior arguments and did not undermine the Report’s reasoning.
- Sweet also moved for a free copy of his Pavey hearing transcript but did not demonstrate financial inability or provide a certified trust-account statement, as required to obtain complimentary copies.
- The district court adopted the Report, granted summary judgment for defendants on exhaustion, denied the transcript request, dismissed the case without prejudice, and directed entry of judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Sweet exhausted administrative remedies | Sweet contends he did not receive a grievance response and/or was prevented from properly filing grievances | Defendants argue Sweet received a response and admitted nothing prevented him from placing grievances in the pick-up box | Court: Sweet failed to exhaust; summary judgment for defendants granted |
| Whether Magistrate Judge’s factual findings warranted de novo review | Sweet objected to the Report’s findings | Defendants argued Report was correct and supported by record and Pavey hearing | Court reviewed objections de novo, found no merit, adopted Report |
| Whether Sweet is entitled to a free transcript of the Pavey hearing | Sweet requested complimentary transcript without submitting proof of indigence or exhaustion of other means | Defendants opposed; asserted no constitutional right to free copies absent showing of need and indigence | Court denied the motion for free transcript for failure to show financial inability and necessity |
| Remedy and disposition | Sweet sought to continue litigation | Defendants sought dismissal based on failure to exhaust | Court dismissed the case without prejudice and entered judgment for defendants |
Key Cases Cited
- Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008) (framework for adjudicating failure-to-exhaust defenses after a Pavey hearing)
- Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734 (7th Cir. 1999) (standard of review for magistrate judge reports and recommendations)
- United States v. Groce, 838 F. Supp. 411 (E.D. Wis. 1993) (no constitutional right to free copies of court files; standards for providing copies at government expense)
- United States v. Wilkinson, 618 F.2d 1215 (7th Cir. 1980) (requirements for obtaining government-funded copies of records)
- Rush v. United States, 559 F.2d 455 (7th Cir. 1977) (discussing standards for furnishing copies to indigent litigants)
