Swaiss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-0286V
Fed. Cl.Oct 16, 2024Background:
- George Swaiss filed a petition in 2015 under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging a small-fiber Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) variant caused by a TDaP vaccine.
- The case involved a full entitlement hearing, post-hearing briefing, an opinion awarding compensation for small fiber neuropathy, and complex damages negotiations.
- On June 2, 2023, the parties agreed to a proffer for compensation, which the Special Master adopted as the decision.
- Swaiss previously received an interim attorneys’ fees and costs award in 2019.
- On December 7, 2023, Swaiss moved for final attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $112,603.64 for legal work and $8.95 in petitioner’s costs.
- The government/respondent did not object to the reasonableness of the requested fees or costs.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to attorneys’ fees/costs | Filed in good faith, supported by proffer | Statutory requirements met | Swaiss entitled to reasonable fees |
| Reasonableness of requested hourly rates | Proposed rates consistent with precedent | No objection | Requested rates found reasonable |
| Reasonableness of hours and expenses billed | Billing entries and expenses properly documented | No objection | Hours and costs awarded as requested |
| Appropriateness of expert/life planner costs | Documentation supports expert service charges | No objection | Full expert costs awarded |
Key Cases Cited
- Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 515 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (sets forum rate rule and Davis County exception for fees)
- Rodriguez v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 632 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (clarifies forum vs. local fee rates for vaccine cases)
- Hall v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 640 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (applies the Davis County exception for fee calculations)
- Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984) (defines reasonable hourly rate standard)
