Suzanna Eckchum A/K/A Susan Eckhert v. State, 03-15-00107-CV

Appellant Suzanna Eckchum filed an affidavit of indigence and moved for rehearing on a May 21, 2015 judgment taxing all costs against her in this appeal and the consolidated matter.
The Court consolidated this appeal with 03-15-00270-CV and dismissed the other, ordering costs against Eckchum.
Eckchum contends she remains indigent and seeks no costs under Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(m) and related authority.
She argues that taxation of costs against her in the dismissed/dismissed-consolidated appeal would force her to advance costs for the consolidated case.
The trial court initially contested her indigence status but allowed her to proceed without advancing costs; Eckchum seeks a judgment that imposes no costs.
Prayer requests the court withdraw the May 21, 2015 judgment and render a new judgment that imposes no costs.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Should costs be assessed against an indigent appellant on dismissal/consolidation?	Eckchum argues no costs due to indigence.	State argues costs may be taxed on dismissal per rule.	No costs should be assessed against Eckchum.

Montalvo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 375 S.W.3d 553 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, no pet.) (affidavit of indigence supports no costs on dismissal)