History
  • No items yet
midpage
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. v. CAUTHON & McGUIGAN
78 So. 3d 709
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant SunTrust sought review of a trial court order granting emergency temporary injunctive relief.
  • Appellee Cauthon & McGuigan maintained funds in a client trust were wrongfully seized in a Nigerian scam.
  • A $289,500 check deposited into SunTrust's trust account cleared and was wired to a purported client.
  • SunTrust discovered the check was fraudulent and seized $78,862.01 from the trust account.
  • The trial court granted a temporary injunction to return the seized funds and required a bond, denying a stay.
  • The First District reversed the injunction on the merits, holding the four-factor test was not satisfied (majority); one dissenter would affirm).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether irreparable harm was shown Cauthon argued harm to clients' funds requires injunctive relief SunTrust contends irreparable harm to innocent third parties justified relief Irreparable harm not established
Whether there was an adequate remedy at law Cauthon argued monetary damages suffice; no real impossibility of later recovery SunTrust argued remedy at law inadequate for protecting third-party funds No adequate remedy at law shown
Whether there was substantial likelihood of success on the merits Cauthon asserted negligence/fiduciary breach and misrepresentation supported relief SunTrust argued contract and statute allowed charge-back and no strong merits No substantial likelihood of success on the merits
Whether the injunction would serve the public interest Cauthon framed protection of innocent third parties as public interest SunTrust argued funds could be preserved without broad injunctive relief Public interest not satisfied under the record

Key Cases Cited

  • St. Johns Inv. Mgmt. Co. v. Albaneze, 22 So.3d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (four-factor test and burden of proof for injunctive relief)
  • Brand v. Old Republic Nat'l Title Ins. Co., 797 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (emergency injunction to avoid misappropriation of escrow funds)
  • Kenet v. Bailey, 679 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (discusses potential remedies and fiduciary relationships in similar contexts)
  • Forrest v. Citi Residential Lending, Inc., 73 So.3d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (review standards for temporary injunctions; abuse of discretion standard)
  • 3299 N. Federal Hwy., Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs of Broward County, 646 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (standard of review: order granting temporary injunction presumed correct absent abuse)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. v. CAUTHON & McGUIGAN
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 2, 2012
Citation: 78 So. 3d 709
Docket Number: 1D11-3451
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.