midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
442 F. App'x 570
D.C. Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • OSHA issued a citation to Summit Contractors, Inc. on May 5, 2005 for a generator and spider box lacking GFCI at a Summit job site.
  • Summit was the general contractor and its supervisor ordered the equipment from a rental company.
  • Neither of Summit’s two onsite employees was exposed to the hazard.
  • The ALJ and the OSHRC affirmed the citation.
  • The Commission held Summit was a controlling and creating employer, justifying liability despite the absence of Summit employees’ exposure.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
APA notice-and-comment applicability of the Multi-Employer Citation Policy Summit argues the policy violated APA § 553 by not undergoing notice and comment. OSHA policy is a general enforcement position exempt from notice and comment. Policy exempt; enforcement based on longstanding precedent, not the policy itself.
Constitution of multi-employer liability under OSH Act § 4(b)(4) Summit contends multi-employer liability risks creating new common-law duties. Liability arises under the OSH Act, not implied common-law duties; § 4(b)(4) does not bar it. No barrier under § 4(b)(4) to multi-employer liability as applied here.
Knowledge requirement for liability (actual or constructive) Summit argues it lacked knowledge of the violation. Knowledge can be imputed via reasonable diligence and supervisor awareness. Substantial evidence supports knowledge through reasonable diligence and supervisor actions.

Key Cases Cited

  • Syncor Int’l Corp. v. Shalala, 127 F.3d 90 (D.C.Cir.1997) (APA notice-and-comment exemption for general policies)
  • Brock v. Cathedral Bluffs Shale Oil Co., 796 F.2d 533 (D.C.Cir.1986) (general policy guidance exempt from notice and comment)
  • NLRB v. Bell Aerospace Co., 416 U.S. 267 (1984) (agency enforcement authority to impose liability through adjudication)
  • Martin v. OSHRC, 499 U.S. 144 (1991) (OSH Act liability standards in adjudication)
  • AJP Constr., Inc. v. Sec’y of Labor, 357 F.3d 70 (D.C.Cir.2004) (knowledge construct for OSH Act violations)
  • A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Sec’y of Labor, 295 F.3d 1341 (D.C.Cir.2002) (supervisor knowledge imputed to employer)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Dec 14, 2011
Citations: 442 F. App'x 570; No. 10-1329
Docket Number: No. 10-1329
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
Log In