midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
196 Ohio App. 3d 759
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Sullivan appeals a Franklin County Court of Common Pleas summary judgment for State Farm on UM/UIM coverage.
  • In 2008 Sullivan, driving a vehicle of her employer, collided with Richard Williams who was at fault.
  • Williams had $12,500 liability coverage with State Farm; Sullivan settled with Williams for policy limits but damages remained.
  • Sullivan sought UM/UIM benefits under State Farm’s policy, which provides $100,000 per accident but contains a regular-use exclusion.
  • The exclusion bars UM/UIM for damages when the insured is in a vehicle not insured under the policy if that vehicle is available for the insured’s regular use by the insured or related.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the regular-use exclusion bars UM/UIM coverage here Sullivan argues material facts remain about regular use and that genuine issues exist for trial. State Farm contends the employer-provided car was regularly used by Sullivan, triggering the exclusion. Regular use affirmed; no UM/UIM coverage.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 42 Ohio St.2d 94 (1975) (regular-use exclusion protects against premium-free use of nonowned vehicles)
  • Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co., 69 Ohio St.3d 582 (1994) (regular use defined as frequent, steady, constant, or systematic use)
  • Kenney v. Employers’ Liab. Assur. Corp., 5 Ohio St.2d 131 (1966) (employer-furnished vehicles can be excluded under regular-use provisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sullivan v. Williams
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 29, 2011
Citations: 196 Ohio App. 3d 759; 965 N.E.2d 373; No. 11AP-135
Docket Number: No. 11AP-135
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In