STRONG Et Al. v. JWM HOLDINGS, LLC; And Vice Versa
341 Ga. App. 309
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Property in Fulton County was owned by Charlene (later Frazier) and then occupied by her husband Oscar until his death in 1998; neither estate probated a will or conveyed the property after their deaths.
- Taxes went unpaid and the property was sold at a 2013 tax sale; purchaser later conveyed to JWM Holdings, LLC in March 2014.
- In March–May 2014 Strong was appointed administrator (Oscar) and temporary administrator (Charlene) and sought to redeem the property; she asked JWM’s counsel for the redemption price.
- JWM’s counsel provided the redemption amount but stated he would reject any tender from Strong or anyone without a legal right to redeem; Strong never made an actual tender and conceded the estates lacked funds and probate approval to redeem.
- Strong sued to quiet title and to enjoin JWM from blocking redemption; JWM moved for summary judgment and counterclaimed for declaratory relief that Strong is forever barred from redeeming due to failure to tender.
- Trial court granted summary judgment to JWM on Strong’s claims for failure to tender but denied JWM’s declaratory counterclaim as premature; appeals followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Strong satisfied the pre-suit tender requirement to redeem after tax sale | Strong: JWM’s pre-suit statements that it would refuse any tender waived the need for an actual pre-suit tender | JWM: Tender must be made before suit to the party entitled to payment; no tender was made | Held: No. Actual, present bona fide offer to pay was required and none was made; summary judgment for JWM affirmed |
| Whether JWM was entitled to declaratory judgment barring any future redemption by Strong | Strong: (implicit) future redemption issues are not ripe/advisory | JWM: Failure to tender in this suit forecloses any future redemption; declaratory relief appropriate | Held: Declaratory claim was premature and non-justiciable; trial court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate future-rights claim — judgment vacated and remanded for dismissal without prejudice |
Key Cases Cited
- Mark Turner Properties v. Evans, 274 Ga. 547 (clarifying tender requirement for redemption)
- Machen v. Wolande Management Group, 271 Ga. 163 (tender must be an actual, present bona fide offer before suit)
- Forrester v. Lowe, 192 Ga. 469 (tender ineffective if not made before action filed)
- Durham v. Crawford, 196 Ga. 381 (tender during pendency of suit is ineffective)
- Community Renewal & Redemption v. Nix, 288 Ga. 439 (discussing redemption statutory scheme)
- B-X Corp. v. Jeter, 210 Ga. 250 (tender may be waived by declaration or conduct of the party entitled to payment)
- Jolly v. Jones, 201 Ga. 532 (definition of tender requires actual present offer to pay)
- Baker v. City of Marietta, 271 Ga. 210 (purpose and scope of Declaratory Judgment Act)
- Fulton County v. City of Atlanta, 299 Ga. 676 (courts limited to justiciable controversies; no advisory opinions)
- Chambers of Ga. v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 232 Ga. App. 632 (decl. relief inappropriate for hypothetical future disputes)
- Pinnacle Benning LLC v. Clark Realty Capital, LLC, 314 Ga. App. 609 (dismissal without prejudice when declaratory claim non-justiciable)
- Citizens & Southern Nat. Bank v. Rayle, 246 Ga. 727 (appellate review principles regarding interlocutory appeals)
