Strohmyer v. Papillion Family Medicine
296 Neb. 884
Neb.2017Background
- Three physicians (Strohmyer, Naegele, Mantler) formed Papillion Family Medicine, P.C. (PFM) in 2000; bylaws included a "Buy Out" provision (unsigned draft dated Oct. 16, 2000) and a signed bylaws document with no buyout procedure.
- Strohmyer notified PFM on Dec. 31, 2013 he would depart effective Mar. 31, 2014 to open his own practice; dispute arose over buyout payments, director fees, and valuation of stock/assets/goodwill.
- PFM’s president (Naegele) set aside $90,000 as an apparent "buy-out escrow," later distributed $30,000 each to Naegele and Mantler; PFM made capital improvements after notice of departure.
- Litigation: Strohmyer sued for unpaid compensation, enforcement of buyout/bylaws, attorney fees under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, and declaratory/injunctive relief; PFM counterclaimed for breach of fiduciary duties (including alleged failure to work agreed 4 days/week and continuing to treat Medicaid patients).
- The district court held PFM was not a Nebraska professional corporation under the Professional Corporation Act, fixed Strohmyer’s stock value (~$104,720), awarded him unpaid compensation ($9,389.27), found no goodwill, and awarded PFM $30,673 for damages related to Medicaid-patient treatment; appeals followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Strohmyer) | Defendant's Argument (PFM/Naegele/Mantler) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation of stock/net equity | District miscalculated fixed assets and averaged inconsistent exhibits; should award higher value | Court should accept defendants’ lower replacement-cost figures (eBay/Craigslist) and district valuation | Court's valuation affirmed in substance; minor calculation errors noted but not reversible; $104,720 upheld |
| Goodwill/intangible value | Practice has intangible value (~$165,000) separable from physician | Any goodwill depends on physician's personal relationships and left with Strohmyer, so no marketable goodwill | No compensable goodwill; affirmed |
| Replacement cost for medical equipment | Expert appraisal (fair market value ~$79,545) should control | Naegele’s eBay/Craigslist-based values (~$19,755) are reliable as items were acquired used | Court reasonably credited Naegele's valuations; affirmed |
| Wage Payment Act / employee status & attorney fees | Entitled to wages, director fees, and attorney fees under Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act | Physicians were not employees (set own schedules, no employment contracts), so Act does not apply | Physicians were not employees under the Act; no wage-act fees awarded; affirmed |
| Fiduciary duty re: Medicaid patients | No breach—PFM ratified or acquiesced to his seeing Medicaid patients; damages speculative | Strohmyer breached fiduciary duty by continuing to treat Medicaid patients after decision to cease; PFM suffered damages | Court erred: multi-year acquiescence/ratification found; award to PFM vacated and remanded regarding those damages |
| Fiduciary duty re: 4-day work expectation (cross-appeal) | N/A | Oral agreement required physicians to work 4 days/week; breach harmed PFM | No enforceable fiduciary duty to work 4 days/week; district court did not err; cross-appeal denied |
Key Cases Cited
- Rauscher v. City of Lincoln, 269 Neb. 267 (discussing de novo review in equitable appeals)
- In re Estate of Stuchlik, 289 Neb. 673 (existence/scope of fiduciary duty as question of law)
- Trieweiler v. Sears, 268 Neb. 952 (officers/directors occupy fiduciary relation to corporation)
- Taylor v. Taylor, 222 Neb. 721 (professional goodwill: marketable business asset vs. individual-dependent goodwill)
- Detter v. Miracle Hills Animal Hosp., 269 Neb. 164 (professional goodwill as factual question in dissolution)
- D & J Hatchery, Inc. v. Feeders Elevator, Inc., 202 Neb. 69 (ratification of unauthorized corporate acts by silence/inaction)
- First Baptist Church v. State, 178 Neb. 831 (market value testimony and admissibility of owner/expert opinion)
- Bellino v. McGrath North, 274 Neb. 130 (duties of partners/officers to act for common benefit)
