History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strobehn v. Mason
2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 225
Mo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Mason (NY attorney) and Walters Bender, a Missouri firm, formed a co-counsel arrangement in a New York personal-injury case in 2007; no written contract was signed.
  • After a mistrial in NY, Mason terminated the arrangement and settled the case for a substantial sum with new co-counsel.
  • Walters Bender asserted a §475 lien in NY and filed a Missouri action seeking personal liability against Mason for fees.
  • NY court fixed Walters Bender’s fee at $109,425.39 with expenses; NY Appell Division remanded to determine reasonableness and expenses.
  • Missouri circuit court adopted the NY findings, awarded Mason $109,425.39 plus prejudgment interest, and held Mason personally liable; Mason appeals on jurisdiction grounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether NY judgment precludes Missouri action Mason argues res judicata/collateral estoppel bar the Missouri suit Walters Bender argues NY ruling allows separate, cumulative remedies Preclusion arguments rejected; action allowed to proceed consistent with NY law.
Whether the circuit court had personal jurisdiction over Mason Mason contends lack of sufficient Missouri contacts Walters Bender asserts Mason solicited services in Missouri and contract performed there MO court has personal jurisdiction; Mason solicited and engaged services in Missouri, with substantial performance there.
Whether the remedies under NY law are cumulative or exclusive [Not explicit in brief; Mason challenges sequencing.] NY law permits charging lien and plenary action to coexist Remedies under §475 and plenary action are cumulative.

Key Cases Cited

  • J.C. W. ex rel. Webb v. Wyciskalla, 275 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. banc 2009) (subject-matter jurisdiction is plenary and defenses may be affirmative defenses)
  • Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 N.Y.2d 343 (1999) (res judicata limits in NY judgments; multiple remedies may be pursued)
  • Haser v. Haser, 271 A.D.2d 253 (2000) (§475 lien not enforceable to impose personal liability; remedies are cumulative)
  • Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Gelmin, 235 A.D.2d 218 (1997) (three remedies (retaining, charging lien, plenary action) are not exclusive but cumulative)
  • State ex rel. Metal Service Center of Georgia, Inc. v. Gaertner, 677 S.W.2d 325 (Mo. 1984) (minimum contacts for jurisdiction can be based on contractual solicitation and Missouri performance)
  • Wilson Tool & Die, Inc. v. TBDN-Tenn. Co., 237 S.W.3d 611 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) (contract made where acceptor spoke; long-arm analysis)
  • Bryant v. Smith Interior Design Grp., Inc., 310 S.W.3d 227 (Mo. banc 2010) (two-step personal jurisdiction: long-arm and minimum contacts; due process)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Strobehn v. Mason
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 26, 2013
Citation: 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 225
Docket Number: No. WD 75140
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.