History
  • No items yet
midpage
Streblow v. Club 180
8:25-cv-00241
D. Neb.
Jun 4, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs are current/former employees, neighbors, and interested parties associated with Club 180, a strip club alleged to be operating illegally in Omaha, Nebraska.
  • Defendant AM314, LLC is the corporate owner/operator of Club 180; Matthew Longcor is a co-owner.
  • Plaintiffs attempted to serve AM314, LLC and Longcor via email, personal residence, and registered agent (who was deceased), but were unsuccessful.
  • Plaintiffs seek court authorization for alternative service by hand delivery and mail to Club 180’s business address after repeated failed attempts.
  • Plaintiffs also request that Defendants pay service costs due to their alleged evasion of service, based on Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Alternative service on Matthew Longcor Exhausted normal methods, so alternative is warranted (Not recorded) Alternative service by hand and mail at business address allowed for Longcor
Alternative service on AM314, LLC Needs court leave to serve via principal office (Not recorded) Motion denied as moot; NE law already allows service at LLC’s principal office by mail
Costs of service under Rule 4(d) Defendants should pay for avoiding service (Not recorded) Request denied without prejudice; may be reasserted after opportunity for defendants to show good cause
Due diligence for alternative service Multiple diligent attempts documented in affidavit (Not recorded) Court found sufficient due diligence for Longcor, alternative service justified

Key Cases Cited

  • No reporter-cited opinions included in the opinion.
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Streblow v. Club 180
Court Name: District Court, D. Nebraska
Date Published: Jun 4, 2025
Docket Number: 8:25-cv-00241
Court Abbreviation: D. Neb.