Streblow v. Club 180
8:25-cv-00241
D. Neb.Jun 4, 2025Background
- Plaintiffs are current/former employees, neighbors, and interested parties associated with Club 180, a strip club alleged to be operating illegally in Omaha, Nebraska.
- Defendant AM314, LLC is the corporate owner/operator of Club 180; Matthew Longcor is a co-owner.
- Plaintiffs attempted to serve AM314, LLC and Longcor via email, personal residence, and registered agent (who was deceased), but were unsuccessful.
- Plaintiffs seek court authorization for alternative service by hand delivery and mail to Club 180’s business address after repeated failed attempts.
- Plaintiffs also request that Defendants pay service costs due to their alleged evasion of service, based on Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative service on Matthew Longcor | Exhausted normal methods, so alternative is warranted | (Not recorded) | Alternative service by hand and mail at business address allowed for Longcor |
| Alternative service on AM314, LLC | Needs court leave to serve via principal office | (Not recorded) | Motion denied as moot; NE law already allows service at LLC’s principal office by mail |
| Costs of service under Rule 4(d) | Defendants should pay for avoiding service | (Not recorded) | Request denied without prejudice; may be reasserted after opportunity for defendants to show good cause |
| Due diligence for alternative service | Multiple diligent attempts documented in affidavit | (Not recorded) | Court found sufficient due diligence for Longcor, alternative service justified |
Key Cases Cited
- No reporter-cited opinions included in the opinion.
