139 So. 3d 1079
La. Ct. App.2014Background
- Weaver’s Roofing contracted to restore Storey’s building roof for $12,500 on Aug 26, 2009.
- Storey sued on Nov 15, 2010 for breach, alleging leaks from improper, non-workmanlike roof work.
- Bench trial held Mar 28, 2013; Weaver testified to contract scope and one-year workmanship warranty.
- Storey presented multiple tenants’ leak complaints and alibis showing incomplete roof replacement.
- Trial court found nonperformance/defective performance; awarded $12,465.45 plus interest and costs; judgment entered Jul 1, 2013.
- Weaver appealed, challenging deposition considerations and damages/credit determinations.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of depositions admitted | Weaver waived objection; Coleman/Herman filed timely per court order. | Depositions not timely filed; record open only to May 31, 2013. | Court did not err; depositions properly considered. |
| Contract performance standard | Weaver failed to perform; leaks persist; workmanship not workmanlike. | Weaver performed as contracted; leaks due to other causes. | Weaver liable for nonperformance/defective performance. |
| Damages and credits | Damages equal to costs to cure/complete defective work plus interest and costs. | Credit for tattoo parlor roof work; offset by amounts paid for repairs. | Damages affirmed; no reversible abuse; offset considered. |
Key Cases Cited
- Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La. 1989) (clear factual findings require manifest error standard of review)
- Lewis v. La Adrienne, Inc., 17 So.3d 1007 (La.App.2d Cir. 2009) (contractor liable for damages for defective workmanship)
- Cascio v. Carpet, 968 So.2d 844 (La.App.2d Cir. 2007) (defective workmanship damages; cost to repair)
- Mount Mariah Baptist Church v. Pannell’s Associated Elec., Inc., 835 So.2d 880 (La.App.2d Cir. 2002) (substantial performance permits partial recovery; discretion on damages)
- Hernandez v. Martinez, 781 So.2d 815 (La.App.5th Cir. 2001) (emphasizes appellate review of damages under abuse-of-discretion standard)
