Stonebridge Life Insurance v. Kissinger
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19552
| D.N.J. | 2015Background
- Stakeholder Stonebridge deposited $50,304 with the Court Registry pursuant to an interpleader action.
- Competing claims to the Death Benefit were filed by Diane Latko (as executrix/creditor and as beneficiary) and Sherry Kissinger (daughter).
- Policy history: JCPenney Life policy originally named Kissinger as beneficiary; 1993 change named Latko; divorce occurred in 2006; insured Randall Latko died in 2013.
- Plaintiff sought interpleader relief, discharge from liability, and an award of attorney’s fees and costs; Latko opposed only the fee award.
- Plaintiff complied with an order to deposit funds (Feb. 9, 2015).
- Default judgments were entered against other insured’s children, who did not participate further.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is interpleader relief appropriate given multiple adverse claims to the fund? | Plaintiff argues two or more adverse claimants exist and fund is at risk. | Latko acknowledges competing claims but seeks exclusion of fee award; she does not oppose interpleader relief. | Yes; interpleader appropriate and stakeholder discharged. |
| Whether Plaintiff may recover attorney’s fees and costs from the deposited funds? | Plaintiff is a disinterested stakeholder who deposited funds and sought discharge. | Plaintiff’s conduct created confusion; fees should be denied. | Fees and costs may be awarded; plaintiff must file a separate fee application. |
| Did Plaintiff’s conduct cause the dispute over the proceeds? | No evidence showing Plaintiff caused the dispute; Kissinger’s claim preceded interpleader. | Plaintiff’s conduct allegedly provoked competing claims. | Court rejected the argument that Plaintiff caused the dispute; no automatic denial of fees. |
Key Cases Cited
- NYLife Distrib., Inc. v. Adherence Group, Inc., 72 F.3d 371 (3d Cir.1995) (interpleader remedial purpose; efficiency in resolving multiple claims)
- Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Hovis, 553 F.3d 258 (3d Cir.2009) (discretion to award fees to disinterested stakeholder in interpleader)
