Stewart v. Town of Watertown
38 A.3d 72
Conn.2012Background
- Virginia Stewart, elected Watertown town clerk in 2001, remained in office until 2010; she stopped working at town hall in 2006 due to alleged environmental health concerns; town paid limited salary and allowed sick leave through mid-2006 before suspending pay; town pursued removal under § 7-22 but state’s attorney declined to file; Stewart filed suit seeking mandatory salary payments and damages, with claims under mandamus and 42 U.S.C. § 1983; trial court granted partial summary judgment recognizing a salary-incident-to-office right and ordered payment of unpaid salary during nonperformance; on appeal, court reversed parts, held genuine issues of material fact remain, and remanded for counts one and three
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether town clerk's salary is payable during nonperformance of duties as a matter of law | Stewart, as public officer, is entitled to salary during term unless removed | Salary not due unless removed under § 7-22; common-law right not absolute | No; genuine issues of material fact; not automatic entitlement to salary during nonperformance |
| Whether Sibley v. State controls despite statutory town clerk framework | Common law attaches salary to the office irrespective of performance | Statutes govern; common law does not grant absolute right to pay | Wrong; Sibley does not establish absolute right; statutory scheme and town ordinance govern |
| Whether town ordinance § 2-82 and § 7-34a/7-34b govern compensation during absence | Compensation package obligates payment irrespective of duties performed | Compensation is limited by town ordinance and applicable statutes; excuse to perform duties may apply | Partial: package governs unless duties excused by conditions or statutory removal; remand necessary for factual development |
| Whether due process instruction regarding notice/hearing was correctly charged | Trial court erred by not instructing based on prior determinations | Prior determinations not controlling; essential facts for count two require trial evidence | Plaintiff's cross-appeal failed; trial court’s count-two instruction upheld as proper given contested facts |
Key Cases Cited
- Sibley v. State, 89 Conn. 682 (1915) (salary as creature of statute; not guaranteed absolute pay to public officers)
- Farrell v. Bridgeport, 45 Conn. 191 (1877) (public officers hold office by trust; pay follows duty)
- Keegan v. Thompson, 103 Conn. 418 (1925) (officers hold office by statute; payment tied to office, not contract)
- McDermott v. New Haven, 107 Conn. 451 (1928) (salary incident to office; wrongful suspension/expulsion may entitle salary during period)
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 196 Conn. 192 (1985) (public office is a trust; duties and compensation linked to public office)
- Watertown v. Stewart implied reference, Not applicable as separate reporter (2012) (discusses statutory scheme for town clerk compensation)
