History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steward v. Kuettel
2014 Ark. 499
| Ark. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Steward appeals a circuit court denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of Kuettel.
  • Kuettel sued Steward for defamation; service was attempted via email under Rule 4(e)(5) after failing to locate Steward at last known address.
  • The circuit court granted alternative service via email with a tracking pixel to confirm receipt.
  • Kuettel obtained a default judgment on June 28, 2012, claiming service was valid and Steward failed to answer.
  • Steward moved to set aside the default judgment on June 17, 2013, arguing insufficient service or excusable neglect; the circuit court denied the motion on October 31, 2013.
  • This appeal focuses on whether the alternative service was reasonably calculated to give actual notice and whether the default judgment is void for insufficient service of process.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the default judgment is void for insufficient service of process Steward: service insufficient; due process requires proper notice Kuettel: email service satisfied Rule 4(e)(5) and tracking confirmed notice Yes; judgment void for insufficient service
Whether the circuit court's alternative service via email was reasonably calculated to give actual notice Steward: tracking did not prove attachments were opened; notice was not reasonably calculated Kuettel: service complied with court order and provided actual notice No; notice not reasonably calculated to give actual notice

Key Cases Cited

  • Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (U.S. Supreme Court 1950) (due-process notice must be reasonably calculated to inform)
  • Meeks v. Stevens, 301 Ark. 464 (Ark. 1990) (valid service required to satisfy due process)
  • Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co., 353 Ark. 701 (Ark. 2003) (strict construction of service rules)
  • Southeast Foods, Inc. v. Keener, 335 Ark. 209 (Ark. 1998) (default judgments should be avoided; harsh remedy)
  • Nationwide Ins. Ent. v. Ibanez, 368 Ark. 432 (Ark. 2007) (standard of review for motion to set aside default)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Steward v. Kuettel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Dec 4, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ark. 499
Docket Number: CV-14-189
Court Abbreviation: Ark.