History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steve Berschauer v. Dep't Of General Admin., State of Washington
35502-1
| Wash. Ct. App. | Dec 12, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1883 McKennys retained strips shown as proposed streets between parcels later owned by Hinchcliff (predecessor to Berschauer) and Craig (predecessor to the State); McKennys later dedicated Cherry Street and Park Street (16th Ave SE) for public use.
  • In 1961 the city vacated 16th Ave SE; Henry Berschauer believed the south half reverted to him and built a fourplex in 1965 that encroached into the vacated area; he and later Steve landscaped and used a 17-foot-wide strip north of his original lot line.
  • In 1969 PSE/State filled part of the vacated gully and created a gravel access area that extended about 8.4 feet onto the south half of the vacated street (i.e., into the area Henry believed he owned); PSE used that gravel area regularly.
  • In 2010 the State obtained a quitclaim to the vacated street from a claimed successor and pursued a boundary adjustment; survey stakes placed in July 2010 landed within the area Steve (the appellant) claimed by adverse possession, prompting his stress-related complaints and later litigation.
  • The trial court: (a) conceded adverse possession to Berschauer for the 17-foot landscaped strip, (b) quieted title to the remaining disputed 8.4-foot gravel strip in the State, (c) found a technical trespass for placement of a survey stake but denied emotional distress damages as too remote a cause, and (d) awarded Berschauer $10,000 (partial) in attorney fees under RCW 7.28.083(3) instead of his requested larger sum.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Effect of street vacation on fee title Vacation passed fee to abutting owners by statute; McKennys’ dedications didn’t reserve fee Dedicator (McKennys) retained fee because dedicated street lay entirely within their original tract; vacation reverts to dedicator/heirs Title to vacated 16th Ave SE reverted to McKennys’ successors; summary judgment for State affirmed
Adverse possession of the 8.4-foot southern gravel strip Father’s belief and use, plus occasional parking and landscaping, support penumbral adverse possession extending into gravel area Gravel area was used more by PSE; south 8.4 ft not reasonably necessary to owner’s objective so no adverse possession No adverse possession for the south 8.4-foot gravel strip; summary judgment for State affirmed
Emotional distress damages from surveyor trespass (stake) Placement of stake on possessed land proximately caused plaintiff’s stress, hospitalization, and damages Trespass was a mere technical/brief invasion; plaintiff’s hospitalizations were remote consequences, not direct proximate result of stake placement Denial of emotional distress damages affirmed; stake was too remote a cause to support such damages
Attorney fees award under RCW 7.28.083(3) Trial court should perform lodestar analysis and award full requested fees ($66k+) because plaintiff prevailed on adverse possession claim Statute grants discretion to award all or a portion of reasonable fees; vague billing made lodestar impractical; $10,000 was equitable $10,000 fee award upheld as within trial court’s broad equitable discretion; lodestar is a guide but court did not abuse discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • London v. City of Seattle, 93 Wn.2d 657 (Wash. 1980) (statutory vacation presumption favoring abutters; exception when dedicator retained entire fee)
  • Chaplin v. Sanders, 100 Wn.2d 853 (Wash. 1984) (elements and ten-year requirement for adverse possession)
  • State v. Stockdale, 34 Wn.2d 857 (Wash. 1951) (penumbral possession: possession may extend to areas reasonably necessary to owner’s objective)
  • Bradley v. Am. Smelting & Refining Co., 104 Wn.2d 677 (Wash. 1985) (trespass is strict liability; entry upon land in another’s possession creates liability)
  • Mahler v. Szucs, 135 Wn.2d 398 (Wash. 1998) (lodestar method as guidance for reasonable attorney-fee awards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Steve Berschauer v. Dep't Of General Admin., State of Washington
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Washington
Date Published: Dec 12, 2017
Docket Number: 35502-1
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Ct. App.