Stephens v. State
291 Ga. 837
| Ga. | 2012Background
- Stephens indicted Feb. 12, 2003 in Jeff Davis County for malice murder and aggravated assault; pled guilty to murder Feb. 28, 2003 and the aggravated assault charge was dismissed; sentenced to life imprisonment Apr. 25, 2003.
- Feb. 27, 2012, Stephens filed pro se motion for out-of-time appeal; trial court denied Feb. 29, 2012; direct appeal then pursued.
- Out-of-time appeals address potential ineffective assistance of counsel in not timely filing an appeal; such relief is available only where issues can be resolved on the existing record, otherwise habeas corpus relief is used for record-expanding claims.
- If issues raised in an out-of-time appeal can be resolved on the record, ineffective-assistance analysis applies; otherwise, the claim requires an evidentiary hearing or is resolved against the movant.
- In deciding such motions, if the claims can be resolved against the defendant on the face of the record, the motion may be denied without a hearing; if not resolvable, an evidentiary hearing is required to address counsel’s conduct.
- The court concluded the asserted issues could be resolved on the existing record and were meritless, so timely direct appeal would have been unsuccessful; the motion for out-of-time appeal was properly denied.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can the raised issues be resolved on the existing record? | Stephens argues defects warrant an out-of-time appeal. | State contends issues are resolvable on the record; no hearing needed. | Yes; issues resolve on record; no out-of-time appeal warranted. |
| Was the indictment defective for venue or underlying felony? | Indictment allegedly lacked venue and underlying felony for malice murder. | Indictment properly charged venue; malice murder does not require a predicate felony. | Venue properly charged; no underlying felony required for malice murder. |
| Did counsel’s failure to inform of defects prejudice the defendant? | Plea was involuntary due to counsel’s failure to warn of defects. | No prejudice because defects did not exist; plea was valid. | No ineffective assistance; no prejudice; denial affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Simmons v. State, 276 Ga. 525 (Ga. 2003) (denial of out-of-time appeal directly appealable when no direct appeal)
- Grantham v. State, 267 Ga. 635 (Ga. 1997) (out-of-time appeal available when direct appeal is meritorious on record-based issues)
- Morrow v. State, 266 Ga. 3 (Ga. 1995) (claims requiring expanded record belong in habeas corpus)
- Smith v. State, 287 Ga. 391 (Ga. 2010) (if the record resolves issues against defendant, no error in denying out-of-time appeal)
- Brown v. State, 290 Ga. 321 (Ga. 2012) (where an issue can be resolved on the existing record, no out-of-time appeal error)
- Long v. State, 287 Ga. 886 (Ga. 2010) (Strickland-based prejudice required when meritorious appeal possible)
- State v. Meeks, 309 Ga. App. 855 (Ga. App. 2011) (indicts that the place is sufficiently certain absent essential element)
- Landers v. State, 285 Ga. 575 (Ga. 2009) (indictment sufficient to charge venue in particular county)
