History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steiner v. Weber
2012 S.D. 40
S.D.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Steiner pleaded guilty to sexual contact with a child in 2009 and received a 15-year sentence with eight years suspended; no appeal filed.
  • Steiner hired counsel Beesley; counsel moved the case quickly with minimal pretrial proceedings.
  • Steiner filed a habeas corpus petition in 2010 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • Judge Davis dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing, ruling on the merits and procedural posture.
  • Court reviews dismissal de novo when no evidence is received and the petition alleges colorable claims, requiring an evidentiary hearing on the merits if plausible.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the circuit court properly dismissed the habeas petition without an evidentiary hearing Steiner’s allegations are plausible and require fact-finding State contends petition is bald/conclusory and should be dismissed Dismissal reversed; evidentiary hearing required on the merits
Whether failure to advise about the corroboration rule constitutes ineffective assistance Counsel’s omission may violate Strickland’s performance prong Not stated as deficient performance in pleadings Potential deficient performance; requires merits hearing to resolve
Whether prejudice prong is met in plea-related ineffectiveness claim Failure to inform about corroboration could have affected plea choices Evidence could have supported conviction notwithstanding rule Prejudice unresolved without evidentiary hearing

Key Cases Cited

  • Jenner v. Dooley, 590 N.W.2d 463 (S.D. 1999) (habeas review limited; threshold plausibility standard for dismissal under 12(b)(5))
  • State v. Best, 232 N.W.2d 447 (S.D. 1975) (corroboration rule in admissibility of extrajudicial confessions)
  • State v. Thompson, 560 N.W.2d 535 (S.D. 1997) (corpus delicti must be proven; corroboration required)
  • Owens v. Russell, 726 N.W.2d 610 (S.D. 2007) (prejudice inquiry in ineffective-assistance plea cases)
  • Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (U.S. 2012) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel in plea bargaining)
  • Missouri v. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (U.S. 2012) (counsel’s duty in plea negotiations; effective assistance at critical stages)
  • Thompson v. State, 1997 S.D. 15, 560 N.W.2d 535 (S.D. 1997) (corpus delicti and sufficiency of corroborating evidence)
  • State v. Best, 89 S.D. 227, 232 N.W.2d 447 (S.D. 1975) (corroboration requirement for admissibility)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Steiner v. Weber
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: May 23, 2012
Citation: 2012 S.D. 40
Docket Number: 26019
Court Abbreviation: S.D.