History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Zolotoff
253 Or. App. 593
Or. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant, an inmate, was found in possession of a spoon shaped as a weapon; deputies testified it could be sharpened further to become a weapon.
  • Defendant requested a jury instruction on attempted possession of a weapon by an inmate; the court declined.
  • The state argued attempted possession requires the charged crime to require intent; the charged crime required knowledge.
  • The jury found defendant guilty of possession by an inmate; defendant appealed alleging error in omitting the attempt instruction.
  • The court held the attempt offense is cognizable despite differing mental states and the trial court erred in not giving the instruction;affirmed reversal and remand.
  • The court rejected the state's harmless-error argument and declined to enter a conviction for attempted possession, instead remanding for proper proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether attempted possession of a weapon by an inmate is cognizable State argues difference in mental state precludes attempt Nakamoto contends attempt instruction appropriate Yes, attempt is cognizable and instructional error
Whether the trial court erred by not giving the attempt instruction State concedes correct law and record supports instruction Nakamoto should have received the instruction Error; reversible, not harmless
Appropriate remedy for error State seeks remand with election to retry or convict for attempt Nakamoto opposes conviction for attempt without trial; remand only Remand required; cannot enter conviction for attempt; reverse and remand accordingly

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Wolfe, 288 Or 521 (1980) (intent required for attempts under specific statutes)
  • State v. Branch, 208 Or App 286 (2006) (instruction on lesser offenses supported by record)
  • State v. Leckenby, 200 Or App 684 (2005) (failure to give lesser-included offense instruction reversible)
  • State v. Moses, 165 Or App 317 (2000) (acquittal-first rule limitations on lesser offenses)
  • State v. Baty, 243 Or App 77 (2011) (attempts may be available despite different mental states)
  • State v. Taylor, 207 Or App 649 (2006) (standard for evaluating requested jury instruction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Zolotoff
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 21, 2012
Citation: 253 Or. App. 593
Docket Number: 09C42126; A145303
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.