State v. Zolotoff
253 Or. App. 593
Or. Ct. App.2012Background
- Defendant, an inmate, was found in possession of a spoon shaped as a weapon; deputies testified it could be sharpened further to become a weapon.
- Defendant requested a jury instruction on attempted possession of a weapon by an inmate; the court declined.
- The state argued attempted possession requires the charged crime to require intent; the charged crime required knowledge.
- The jury found defendant guilty of possession by an inmate; defendant appealed alleging error in omitting the attempt instruction.
- The court held the attempt offense is cognizable despite differing mental states and the trial court erred in not giving the instruction;affirmed reversal and remand.
- The court rejected the state's harmless-error argument and declined to enter a conviction for attempted possession, instead remanding for proper proceedings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether attempted possession of a weapon by an inmate is cognizable | State argues difference in mental state precludes attempt | Nakamoto contends attempt instruction appropriate | Yes, attempt is cognizable and instructional error |
| Whether the trial court erred by not giving the attempt instruction | State concedes correct law and record supports instruction | Nakamoto should have received the instruction | Error; reversible, not harmless |
| Appropriate remedy for error | State seeks remand with election to retry or convict for attempt | Nakamoto opposes conviction for attempt without trial; remand only | Remand required; cannot enter conviction for attempt; reverse and remand accordingly |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Wolfe, 288 Or 521 (1980) (intent required for attempts under specific statutes)
- State v. Branch, 208 Or App 286 (2006) (instruction on lesser offenses supported by record)
- State v. Leckenby, 200 Or App 684 (2005) (failure to give lesser-included offense instruction reversible)
- State v. Moses, 165 Or App 317 (2000) (acquittal-first rule limitations on lesser offenses)
- State v. Baty, 243 Or App 77 (2011) (attempts may be available despite different mental states)
- State v. Taylor, 207 Or App 649 (2006) (standard for evaluating requested jury instruction)
