History
  • No items yet
midpage
331 P.3d 1023
Or. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • This case on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Backstrand, Highley, and Anderson.
  • Zamora-Martinez II held that Billison’s second identification request transformed the encounter into a stop under Article I, section 9.
  • ICE Agent Billison accompanied Hillsboro narcotics during a search at defendant’s sister’s residence; he detained several adults for immigration and drug charges.
  • Defendant arrived to take custody of his nieces; officers called Billison, who then asked for defendant’s identification after confirming nationality as Mexican.
  • There were multiple officers present; the encounter lasted less than two minutes; defendant produced Oregon ID, then provided additional IDs which revealed forgeries.
  • The trial court denied suppression; on appeal, the panel concluded the stop was unlawful and reversed/remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the second ID request amount to a seizure under Art. I, §9? Zamora-Martinez Zamora-Martinez Yes; unlawful seizure
Was the seizure supported by reasonable suspicion under the totality of circumstances? Zamora-Martinez Zamora-Martinez Not this result; seizure exceeded permissible encounter
Do Backstrand, Highley, and Anderson require a different assessment of restraint than Ashbaugh? Zamora-Martinez Zamora-Martinez Yes; totality showed restraint in this case
Should the evidence be suppressed on remand? Zamora-Martinez Zamora-Martinez Reversed and remanded for suppression ruling

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ashbaugh, 349 Or 297 (2010) (test for seizure under Art I, §9)
  • Backstrand, 354 Or 392 (2013) (when identification requests are not accompanied by restraint, not a seizure)
  • Highley, 354 Or 459 (2013) (identification requests analyzed in totality of circumstances)
  • Anderson, 354 Or 440 (2013) (identification and restraint framework in encounters)
  • Holmes, 311 Or 400 (1991) (scope of permissible police-citizen encounters)
  • Zamora-Martinez, 229 Or App 397 (2009) (Zamora-Martinez I discussed initial suppression issue)
  • Zamora-Martinez, 244 Or App 213 (2011) (Zamora-Martinez II—focus on stop/identification issue)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Zamora-Martinez
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jul 2, 2014
Citations: 331 P.3d 1023; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 897; 264 Or. App. 50; 2014 WL 2978229; C051006CR; A129382
Docket Number: C051006CR; A129382
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In