History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Yancey
2017 Ohio 1040
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Robert Stanley Yancey broke into an occupied apartment with a brick on Oct. 2, 2015, threatened the resident, and stole checks and personal items.
  • Stolen checks were later used to obtain cash from banks.
  • Indictment: Count 1 aggravated burglary (with prior/violent specs), Count 2 theft (lessee), Counts 3–4 theft (Woodforest Bank, U.S. Bank).
  • Plea deal: Yancey pled guilty to Count 1 (spec deleted) and Counts 3 and 4; Count 2 was nolled.
  • Trial court imposed consecutive terms: 10 years (aggravated burglary) + 1 year + 1 year, for a 12-year aggregate sentence; defense made no merger objection below.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether aggravated burglary and the two theft counts are allied offenses requiring merger under R.C. 2941.25 Prosecution: offenses are separate because they involved different victims and separate conduct Yancey: offenses are allied — same animus and occurred at the same time Court: No merger. Offenses were committed separately and involved separate victims; sentences may be consecutive

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ruff, 143 Ohio St.3d 114 (2015) (sets Ohio allied-offenses test; offenses involving separate victims are of dissimilar import)
  • State v. Rogers, 143 Ohio St.3d 385 (2015) (discusses plain-error standard for unpreserved Crim.R. 52(B) claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Yancey
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 23, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 1040
Docket Number: 104587
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.