History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Wright
2013 Ohio 3132
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Ellery Wright pled guilty to two separate fifth-degree felonies: drug possession (May 8, 2012) and theft (June 5, 2012).
  • Initial sentences: drug possession — 12 months community control, GED and treatment requirements; theft — 18 months community control and $3,500 restitution.
  • Wright violated community control by testing positive for PCP and cocaine, failing to attend ordered drug treatment and AA meetings, and not pursuing his GED.
  • At a violation hearing (Aug. 10, 2012) the trial court revoked community control and imposed the maximum 12-month prison term on each case, to be served consecutively.
  • Wright appealed, arguing the trial court erred by imposing maximum consecutive sentences without meaningful analysis supporting the statutory findings required for consecutive terms.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly imposed maximum consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) State: trial court made the required statutory findings (necessary to protect public/punish; not disproportionate; statutory factor present) Wright: court failed to provide meaningful analysis or reasons supporting those findings Court affirmed: record shows the court made the required findings and need not provide extended justification; consecutive maximum sentences were proper

Key Cases Cited

  • None with official reporter citations were relied on in the opinion (the court cited recent Ohio appellate decisions and statutory provisions but not authorities having official reporter citations).
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wright
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 18, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 3132
Docket Number: 98901
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.