History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Wohl
2017 Ohio 4367
Ohio Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Camron Wohl (age 27) was indicted for three counts of rape, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping based on conduct on May 31, 2016 involving a 73-year-old victim.
  • Allegations: forced entry, held victim at knifepoint, stole pain medication, digitally, vaginally, and anally raped her, poured bleach on her head, and tied her to a bookshelf.
  • Wohl pled guilty to three counts of rape, one count of burglary (R.C. 2911.12(A)(1)), and one count of kidnapping on August 22, 2016.
  • The trial court sentenced Wohl to an aggregate 35-year prison term on November 10, 2016.
  • On appeal, Wohl argued the burglary and the three rape convictions were allied offenses of similar import and therefore should have merged for sentencing.
  • The Twelfth District Court of Appeals affirmed, rejecting plain-error merger review and upholding separate sentences for each rape and the burglary.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether burglary and three rape convictions are allied offenses under R.C. 2941.25 State: offenses were properly sentenced separately because the record shows distinct harms and separate acts Wohl: burglary and the three rapes are allied offenses of similar import and should merge for sentencing Court: Affirmed — offenses do not merge because burglary was completed prior to separate sexual acts, and each sexual act caused separate, identifiable harm
Whether forfeiture/plain-error standard applies State: defendant forfeited merger claim by not raising it below; plain-error review applies Wohl: contends merger should be recognized despite forfeiture Court: Forfeiture applies; plain-error review governs, and no plain error occurred

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Williams, 148 Ohio St.3d 403 (addresses forfeiture and plain-error review for allied-offense claims)
  • State v. Ruff, 143 Ohio St.3d 114 (clarifies Ruff test: evaluate conduct, animus, and import for allied-offense analysis)
  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 (discusses earlier two-part allied-offense test referenced in precedent)
  • State v. Jackson, 149 Ohio St.3d 55 (addresses when burglary is complete relative to subsequent conduct)
  • State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (describes plain-error standard under Crim.R. 52(B))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wohl
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 19, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 4367
Docket Number: CA2016-11-218
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.