State v. Wilson
2014 Ohio 2342
Ohio Ct. App.2014Background
- Defendant Corey A. Wilson was indicted in Madison County on counts involving illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material, plus a possession charge.
- He pled guilty to counts one and three; counts two, four, and five were dismissed; he received a four-year sentence on count one and a one-year sentence on count three, to run concurrently.
- Wilson did not appeal his conviction or sentence directly.
- He later filed a postconviction relief petition arguing ineffective assistance of counsel and suppression issues tied to statements made May 9, 2012.
- The trial court denied the petition and an evidentiary hearing; the court relied on Kapper to justify denial without a hearing.
- The appellate court partially reversed, finding the suppression claim required findings of fact and law or a hearing, and remanded for further proceedings on that issue.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court erred by denying postconviction relief without a hearing on coercion claims | Wilson asserts ineffective assistance based on a guaranteed two-year sentence promise and other factors. | State contends the record shows valid Crim.R. 11 advisement and no coercive promises; no hearing required. | Partially reversed; denial without proper findings on the suppression claim. |
| Whether the trial court failed to make findings and conclusions on the suppression claim | Wilson argues the court did not address his claim that counsel failed to file a suppression motion for May 9, 2012 statements. | State contends the issue is subsumed by other record evidence and Miranda considerations; suppression path not properly preserved. | Remanded for findings of fact and conclusions or for an evidentiary hearing on the suppression claim. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Kapper, 5 Ohio St.3d 36 (Ohio 1983) (Petition may be dismissed without a hearing when record shows no entitlement to relief)
- State v. Dillingham, 2012-Ohio-5841 (12th Dist. Butler 2012) (Abuse of discretion standard; postconviction relief is collateral attack)
- State v. Vore, 2013-Ohio-1490 (12th Dist. Warren 2013) (Evidentiary hearing not automatically guaranteed; significance of evidentiary facts)
- State v. Blankenburg, 2012-Ohio-6175 (12th Dist. Butler 2012) (Denial of postconviction relief without hearing; substantive grounds required)
- State v. McMullen, 2007-Ohio-125 (Ohio Supreme Court 2007) (Sufficiency of findings and rationale in postconviction decisions)
