224 So. 3d 1194
La. Ct. App.2017Background
- Defendant Farrell W. Williams, Jr. was charged with possession of heroin (La. R.S. 40:966(C)); convicted by jury and originally sentenced to 10 years at hard labor.
- After conviction, the State filed a multiple-offender bill alleging Williams was a second felony offender based on a prior heroin-possession conviction; the court adjudicated him a second felony offender.
- The district court vacated the original 10-year sentence and imposed the statutory maximum enhanced sentence of 20 years at hard labor without benefits; Williams appealed and challenged denial of his motion to reconsider and argued the enhanced sentence was constitutionally excessive.
- Facts underlying conviction: undercover detectives observed behavior suggesting a drug transaction; following a stop of a red Chrysler Sebring (identified by an informant as Williams’ vehicle), Williams was arrested and three grams of heroin were found on his person.
- The record shows plea offers: State offered a second-felon plea for a 12-year sentence (with concessions on other charges); Williams rejected and denied the multiple-offender bill at the hearing, losing the opportunity for a reduced 15-year stipulation and receiving 20 years after contesting the bill.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denial of motion to reconsider sentence | State (plaintiff) asserts sentence is within statutory limits and properly imposed | Williams argued the court erred in denying his motion to reconsider the enhanced sentence | Court held denial was proper; review limited to constitutional excessiveness and sentence stands |
| Constitutional excessiveness of 20-year enhanced sentence | State argued sentence was not grossly disproportionate given offense, history, and comparable cases | Williams argued enhanced 20-year term shocks the sense of justice | Court held 20-year sentence (within statutory maximum) was not constitutionally excessive given nature of heroin offense, defendant’s history, and precedent; affirmed sentence |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Brown, 173 So.3d 1262 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (motion to reconsider limits review to excessiveness if specific grounds not stated)
- State v. McGowan, 199 So.3d 1156 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (standards for Eighth Amendment/Article I § 20 excessiveness review)
- State v. Hill, 106 So.3d 1209 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (definition of "grossly disproportionate" and factors for review)
- State v. Thompson, 842 So.2d 330 (La.) (upholding 20-year enhanced sentence for second felony offender with heroin convictions)
- State v. Oliveaux, 312 So.2d 337 (La.) (errors-patent review authority)
- State v. Weiland, 556 So.2d 175 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (errors-patent review authority)
