128 So. 3d 1250
La. Ct. App.2013Background
- Defendant Kenyetta Denise Williams (age 16 at offense) was linked to the homicide of Marvin Aguilar Osario and arrested after using the victim’s cell phone; she confessed after being Mirandized and questioned without a guardian present.
- Victim died of multiple stab wounds; Williams and an accomplice had been engaged in prostitution with the victim and robbed him (cell phone, handgun, money).
- Williams was indicted for second-degree murder; sanity evaluation found her competent and not legally insane.
- By plea agreement Williams pled guilty to attempted manslaughter (maximum 20 years) after Boykin colloquy acknowledging possible 20-year sentence; court ordered PSI.
- Sentenced to 20 years at hard labor; motion to reconsider (arguing victim’s conduct and her youth) denied.
- On appeal Williams argued the sentence was excessive; the court affirmed conviction and 20-year sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Williams' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether 20-year sentence is excessive | 20 years (maximum) not warranted; she is not a worst offender; mitigating factors (teenage, homeless, prostitution, rehabilitation) | Trial court properly considered factors, plea reduced exposure from murder to attempted manslaughter, violence and death aggravated sentence | Affirmed: sentence not constitutionally excessive; court acted within discretion |
| Whether trial court complied with La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 | Court failed to adequately consider mitigating factors | Court complied: ordered PSI, considered personal history, mitigating and aggravating factors | Affirmed: record shows cognizance of 894.1 criteria |
| Whether sentence is grossly disproportionate under La. Const. art. I, § 20 | 20-year term shocks the sense of justice given circumstances | Sentence proportional to harm (death during planned robbery) and defendant received plea-leniency | Affirmed: not grossly disproportionate |
| Whether plea bargaining justified significant reduction from murder exposure | N/A (argument focused on excessiveness) | Plea reduced exposure from mandatory life for 2nd-degree murder to max 20 years; court may impose max when plea charge understates conduct | Affirmed: trial court within discretion to impose maximum for plea offense |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Elmore, 80 So.3d 731 (La. App. 2011) (art. 894.1’s goal is factual articulation, not rigid checklist)
- State v. Jones, 398 So.2d 1049 (La. 1981) (factors to consider at sentencing: personal history, prior record, seriousness, rehabilitation)
- State v. Haley, 873 So.2d 747 (La. App. 2004) (sentencing review standards)
- State v. McKinney, 976 So.2d 802 (La. App. 2008) (court may impose maximum where plea reduces exposure and plea offense understates conduct)
- State v. Williams, 893 So.2d 7 (La. 2004) (wide trial court discretion in sentencing; appellate review for abuse only)
- State v. Smith, 839 So.2d 1 (La. 2003) (constitutional prohibition on grossly disproportionate sentences)
- State v. Weaver, 805 So.2d 166 (La. 2002) (gross disproportionality standard: shocks sense of justice)
