History
  • No items yet
midpage
106 So. 3d 1068
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief after defendant pled guilty to two counts in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.
  • Plea colloquy and bill of information identified: (i) felon in possession of a firearm; (ii) possession of 28–199 grams of cocaine; sentences proposed were 12 and 10 years, respectively.
  • On December 2, 2009, trial judge sentenced defendant to 12 years on Count 1 and 10 years on Count 2, to run concurrently with other cases.
  • Defendant then faced a multiple offender bill; stipulation reduced underlying penalties tied to the enhanced sentence.
  • On January 10, 2012, defendant sought post-conviction relief reinstating his right to appeal, which was granted; this appeal followed.
  • An independent review under Anders/Jyles confirmed no non-frivolous issues; convictions and sentences were affirmed and appellate counsel was permitted to withdraw.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Anders withdrawal was proper after independent review State supports withdrawal; no non-frivolous issues Williams contends no meritorious issues exist Appropriate: no non-frivolous issues; counsel withdrawn; conviction and sentences affirmed
Whether the guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily entered given art. 556.1 omissions Plea valid; Boykin rights waived; informed of penalties Minimum penalties not advised; potential infirmity Harmless error for missing minimum penalties; pleas still valid
Whether sentences were within the plea agreement and hence not reviewable Sentences within statutory ranges and per plea agreement; not reviewable Potential challenge to sentence terms Within range per plea and enhanced under multiple bill; not subject to review
Whether errors patent require remand or correction Errors patent corrected as needed; no remand for fine Possible need for correction of commitment and penalties Remanded for correction of commitment to reflect second felony offender status; otherwise affirmed; errors patent noted

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967) (basis for withdrawal when no non-frivolous issues exist; must accompany brief)
  • State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976) (preserves review when pre-plea motions exist; Crosby rules on preserved rulings)
  • State v. Williams, 800 So.2d 790 (La.2001) (self-activating restrictions on parole/non-suspension in habitual offender sentences)
  • State v. Hart, 66 So.3d 44 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2011) (error patent; remand for commitment correction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 11, 2012
Citations: 106 So. 3d 1068; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1612; 2012 WL 6176489; 12 La.App. 5 Cir. 299; No. 12-KA-299
Docket Number: No. 12-KA-299
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Williams, 106 So. 3d 1068