History
  • No items yet
midpage
2016 Ohio 2629
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Adrian Williams pleaded guilty to gross sexual imposition (3rd°) and attempted kidnapping with a sexual-motivation specification (2nd°) under a negotiated, agreed aggregate sentence of five years.
  • At the plea colloquy the court acknowledged the five-year agreement but did not warn Williams that it could impose a longer term at sentencing.
  • At sentencing, after Williams claimed innocence, the trial court imposed an aggregate eight-year prison term based on his criminal history.
  • Williams filed a direct appeal but obtained dismissal of that appeal under App.R. 28 after two extensions rather than pursuing merits.
  • Williams then filed postsentence motions to withdraw his guilty plea; the trial court denied them and Williams appealed the denial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Williams may withdraw his postsentence guilty plea to correct "manifest injustice" under Crim.R. 32.1 State: Res judicata bars the motion because Williams could have raised alleged sentencing error on direct appeal Williams: Trial court retained jurisdiction and should consider motion because no appellate panel affirmed conviction; trial court failed to warn him about possible longer sentence Denied: Res judicata applies; Williams could have raised the claim on direct appeal and cannot relitigate it in a postsentence withdrawal motion

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Smith, 49 Ohio St.2d 261 (1977) (standard: postsentence withdrawal available only to correct manifest injustice)
  • State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521 (1992) (abuse-of-discretion review for plea-withdrawal denials)
  • State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448 (2010) (res judicata bars claims that could have been raised on direct appeal)
  • State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. Judges, Court of Common Pleas, 55 Ohio St.2d 94 (1978) (once conviction is affirmed on appeal, trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider postsentence plea-withdrawal)
  • State v. Asberry, 173 Ohio App.3d 443 (2007) (failure to warn defendant about court’s independent sentencing consideration can be reversible error)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 21, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ohio 2629; 103144
Docket Number: 103144
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Williams, 2016 Ohio 2629