History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Williams
2012 Ohio 5873
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Edward Williams was convicted by jury of four counts (two grand theft, two tampering with records) and sentenced to one year in prison with specified restitution.
  • Appeal followed after Williams’ death in prison; this court substituted counsel and continued the appeal as if he were alive.
  • Restitution: $36,023.87 to ODJFS and $64,900 to SSA were ordered.
  • The trial court’s voir dire potentially closed to the public; the record on actual spectators’ exclusion was inconclusive.
  • Several assignments of error challenged public-trial rights, allocution, restitution, and costs; other issues were deemed moot or resolved.
  • The court ultimately affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Public-voir-dire closure likely violated public-trial rights Williams Williams No reversible error; no conclusive closure proved; structural error not established.
Counsel provided ineffective assistance for not objecting to closure Williams Williams Absent proof of actual closure, no prejudice shown; claim rejected.
Right of allocution before sentencing was violated Williams Williams Allocution satisfied; defendant afforded opportunities to speak.
Order of restitution violated by failure to consider ability to pay and by death of defendant Williams Williams Restitution order sustained on plain-error grounds but remanded; death requires reconsideration; costs on remand.

Key Cases Cited

  • Presley v. Georgia, 130 S. Ct. 721 (2010) (public trial right extends to voir dire)
  • Lane v. State, 60 Ohio St.2d 112 (1979) (public-trial right; voir dire)
  • Bethel v. State, 110 Ohio St.3d 416 (2006) (public-trial rights not waived by silence)
  • State v. Drummond, 111 Ohio St.3d 14 (2006) (structural error in closed courtroom; standard)
  • State v. Fry, 125 Ohio St.3d 163 (2010) (allocution; defendant personally addressed by court)
  • State v. Vickers, 2002-Ohio-3628 (2002) (allocution; court addressed defendant)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 12, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 5873
Docket Number: 26014
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.