548 P.3d 146
Or. Ct. App.2024Background
- Defendant, Wellington, was convicted by a jury of 30 sexual offenses against his stepson, J., including sodomy and sexual abuse.
- The criminal acts took place over several years, beginning when J. was roughly 10 years old; the conduct included offers of money for sexual acts.
- At trial, the prosecution referenced other, uncharged criminal acts during closing arguments and described why only certain crimes were charged.
- Defendant did not object at trial to the prosecutor’s comments or to testimony from J’s mother that allegedly vouched for J’s credibility.
- Defendant appealed, claiming (1) prosecutorial misconduct and (2) that the trial court should have, on its own, stricken the vouching testimony.
- The appellate review was for "plain error" since no objections were preserved at trial.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prosecutorial misconduct for referencing uncharged crimes in closing | Prosecutor’s comments were not improper or were not so prejudicial as to deny a fair trial | Comments were improper and prejudicial, inviting jury to infer guilt from uncharged crimes | Not plain error: Comments improper but not so egregious as to deny a fair trial; curable by instruction |
| Failure to strike vouching testimony by J’s mother | Testimony not clear vouching; ambiguous and contextual | Testimony clearly vouched for J’s credibility and was improper | Not plain error: Testimony ambiguous, not clear vouching, legal point reasonably in dispute |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Chitwood, 370 Or 305 (prosecutor’s improper arguments amount to plain error only if so prejudicial as to deny a fair trial)
- State v. Gornick, 340 Or 160 (sets out test for plain error review: error of law, obvious, on face of record)
- State v. Davis, 345 Or 551 (proper jury instructions generally cure prejudice from prosecutorial misconduct)
- State v. Brunnemer, 287 Or App 182 (defines prosecutorial misconduct and when arguments are improper)
- State v. Charboneau, 323 Or 38 (rule against witness vouching for credibility of another witness)
