State v. Waugh
2011 SD 71
| S.D. | 2011Background
- Waugh was charged with rape of a minor and attempted rape of Stroup, plus burglary charges in Stroup’s home and related offenses in Minor’s case.
- The circuit court joined the two cases for trial, and the jury convicted Waugh of rape of Minor and attempted rape of Stroup, but acquitted burglary of Stroup’s home.
- Evidence showed Waugh entered Stroup’s home in the early morning, pulled down Stroup’s clothing, and exposed himself; Stroup called 911.
- Minutes later, in the same vicinity, Minor awoke to Waugh on top of her with semen compatible with Waugh, following prior drinking and interaction with L.D. that evening.
- DNA from a penile swab matched Waugh and Minor; the cases were linked by proximity in time and location and by Waugh’s prior interactions with both victims.
- Waugh challenged joinder as improper and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence; the circuit court granted joinder, and the jury found guilt on the charged counts.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether joinder of informations was proper | Waugh argues incorrect joinder due to dissimilar victims and details. | Waugh contends joinder risks prejudice and should be severed. | Joinder proper; no reversible prejudice. |
| Sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions | Evidence supports intent and acts toward rape/attempt as charged. | Evidence insufficient or credibility issues negated elements of intent and non-consent. | Evidence sufficient to sustain guilt beyond reasonable doubt. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Thompson, 1997 S.D. 15 (S.D. 1997) (abuse-of-discretion standard for joinder)
- State v. Shape, 517 N.W.2d 650 (S.D. 1994) (three tests for joinder)
- State v. Sabers, 442 N.W.2d 259 (S.D. 1989) (prejudice threshold for severance)
- State v. Dixon, 419 N.W.2d 699 (S.D. 1988) (prejudice considerations in joinder)
- State v. White, 538 N.W.2d 237 (S.D. 1995) (admissibility of other acts evidence in rape cases)
- State v. Fisher, 2010 S.D. 44 (S.D. 2010) (remoteness/similarity in other acts evidence)
- State v. Reed, 2010 S.D. 66 (S.D. 2010) (definition of attempt and required acts toward commission)
