History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Violett
2012 Ohio 2685
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • J.C., a ten-year-old, testified that Violett touched her in vaginal area and breasts and had her touch him in his private area.
  • J.C. described two separate acts of abuse occurring around late 2009 and some months later while she slept in Grandmother's home.
  • Violett was indicted in September 2010 on two counts of gross sexual imposition, a third-degree felony under R.C. 2907.05(A)(4).
  • A bench trial resulted in convictions on both counts and a total sentence of two years in prison.
  • Violett appeals arguing insufficiency of evidence and that the convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for GSI counts Violett contends evidence fails to prove sexual contact with a minor. Violett argues the State did not present sufficient proof of the elements. Evidence sufficient to sustain convictions.
Manifest weight of the evidence Weight of evidence favors acquittal due to inconsistencies and credibility issues. Weight favors acquittal; credibility resolved against state. Convictions not against the manifest weight; credible witness findings uphold verdict.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1991) (sufficiency standard: whether evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997) (weighing evidence; credibility considerations)
  • State v. Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (1986) (thirteenth-juror review; defer to trier of fact on credibility)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (1967) (credibility and weight of the evidence reside with the factfinder)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Violett
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 18, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2685
Docket Number: 11CA0106-M
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.