227 N.C. App. 198
N.C. Ct. App.2013Background
- Defendant Vaughn was tried for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill and inflicting serious injury (trial occurred March 5–7, 2012).
- The incident began April 18, 2009, at Music City nightclub in Greensboro, involving Vaughn, Kenney, and Pressley.
- Kenney and Vaughn returned to the parking lot after an interaction with Pressley, where Vaughn later armed herself with a knife.
- Pressley assaulted Vaughn; Kenney intervened; after a separate altercation, Vaughn stabbed Pressley in the chest during a confrontation involving multiple parties.
- Vaughn was convicted and sentenced; she appealed, challenging the jury instruction on self-defense as an aggressor.
- The appellate court granted a new trial due to plain error in the aggressor instruction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the aggressor element instruction was appropriate given the evidence. | Vaughn contends no evidence shows she was aggressor. | Vaughn argues instruction improperly barred self-defense not supported by evidence. | New trial granted; error prejudicial. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Jenkins, 202 N.C. App. 291 (N.C. App. 2010) (instruction improper when no evidence defendant was aggressor; new trial)
- State v. Porter, 340 N.C. 320 (N.C. 1995) (where instructions on aggressor are unsupported, new trial)
- State v. Wynn, 278 N.C. 513 (N.C. 1971) (defendant not aggressor when he did not start fight)
- State v. Tann, 57 N.C. App. 527 (N.C. App. 1982) (armed in anticipation; no clear aggressor; improper aggressor instruction)
- State v. Washington, 234 N.C. 531 (N.C. 1951) (defendant opened confrontation but not clearly aggressor; new trial)
- Ward, 26 N.C. App. 159 (N.C. App. 1975) (prejudicial error when aggressor instruction given without evidence)
