History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Unger
333 P.3d 1009
| Or. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Oregon case on suppression of evidence following consent searches after unlawful police conduct (backyard trespass) and whether consent taint requires suppression.
  • Detectives knocked at front then circled to back door; defendant consented to enter and tour; bag with meth found during tour.
  • Evidence and statements obtained after unlawful entry were later used to obtain a search warrant and additional evidence.
  • Court of Appeals suppressed; State sought review to modify Hall exploitation analysis; Unger majority overruled part of Hall.
  • Majority modifies exploitation framework, disavowing Hall's “minimal factual nexus” requirement and emphasizing totality-of-circumstances.
  • Concurrences and dissents debate deterrence versus rights-based rationale, with several justices urging deterrence as a factor in suppression.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Exploitation analysis framework—whether Hall should be retained or revised State seeks overruling Hall; adopts Hemenway modifications Unger defends keeping Hall's approach Hall's minimal nexus rejected; adopt totality-of-circumstances framework
How voluntariness and exploitation interact when consent follows unlawful conduct State argues consent tainted if exploitation occurred Unger argues consent can be voluntary despite illegality Consent must be voluntary and not derived from exploitation to admit evidence
Role of purpose and flagrancy in exploitation inquiry State argues purpose and flagrancy relevant Defendant argues against tying deterrence to article I, section 9 Purpose and flagrancy may weigh in; not required per se

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hall, 339 Or 7 (2005) (exploitation framework for consent searches; minimal nexus concept scrutinized)
  • State v. Hemenway, 353 Or 129 (2013) (modifies Hall exploitation approach (cite summarized))
  • State v. Rodriguez, 317 Or 27 (1993) (consent must be independent of illegality; prior cases used Wong Sun approach)
  • State v. Kennedy, 290 Or 493 (1981) (consent voluntary; independence from prior illegality analyzed)
  • Wong Sun U.S., 371 U.S. 471 (1963) (exploitation concept in federal law)
  • Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975) (purpose and flagrancy factors in attenuation)
  • Johnson, 335 Or 511 (2003) (nexus and burden-shifting in attenuation analysis)
  • Ashbaugh, 349 Or 297 (2010) (knocks approach for seizures and encounters under Article I, section 9)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Unger
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 28, 2014
Citation: 333 P.3d 1009
Docket Number: CC 09C42443; CA A144192; SC S060888
Court Abbreviation: Or.