History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Underwood
2016 Ohio 1101
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Preston Underwood struck and shoved patron Ben Hirsch inside a crowded bar; Hirsch was rendered briefly unconscious and required seven staples for a head wound.
  • Video (no audio) showed Underwood punch then shove Hirsch to the floor; Underwood did not testify and no eyewitnesses contradicted the video.
  • Indictment: one count of Felonious Assault (R.C. 2903.11(A)(1)) and one count of Criminal Damaging; jury convicted on both counts; sentence: 5 years (felonious assault) concurrent with 90 days.
  • Defense requested a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of misdemeanor Assault (R.C. 2903.13(A)); trial court denied the instruction, characterizing the conduct as knowing (not reckless) and the injury as serious.
  • On appeal, Underwood argued the court abused its discretion by refusing the lesser-included instruction; the State argued the evidence could not reasonably support acquittal of felonious assault but conviction of misdemeanor assault.
  • Court of Appeals affirmed, holding the evidence (including the video and hospitalization) did not permit a reasonable jury to find serious physical harm was not knowingly caused.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on misdemeanor Assault as a lesser-included of Felonious Assault State: No — evidence only supports knowing conduct causing serious physical harm; lesser instruction would invite unreasonable verdict Underwood: Yes — jury could reasonably find he knowingly caused physical harm but not knowingly caused serious physical harm (i.e., convict of Assault instead) No error — trial court did not abuse discretion; evidence could not reasonably support acquittal on felonious assault and conviction on misdemeanor assault

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Deanda, 136 Ohio St.3d 18 (Ohio 2013) (two-tiered test for lesser-included offenses: statutory-elements step and evidence step)
  • State v. Kidder, 32 Ohio St.3d 279 (Ohio 1987) (lesser-included analysis—statutory comparison)
  • State v. Trimble, 122 Ohio St.3d 297 (Ohio 2009) (court must view evidence in light most favorable to defendant when deciding lesser-included instruction; "sufficient evidence" required)
  • State v. Shane, 63 Ohio St.3d 630 (Ohio 1992) (lesser-included instruction required only where evidence would reasonably support both acquittal of greater and conviction of lesser)
  • State v. Johnson, 36 Ohio St.3d 224 (Ohio 1988) (error to instruct on lesser offense unsupported by evidence)
  • State v. Comen, 50 Ohio St.3d 206 (Ohio 1990) (trial court need only give instructions relevant and necessary to allow jury to weigh evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Underwood
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 18, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 1101
Docket Number: 26711
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.