State v. Tyler
291 Neb. 920
| Neb. | 2015Background
- Shooting outside Halo Ultra Lounge in Omaha; victim Delayno Wright died of gunshot wound.
- Investigators linked Avery Tyler to the crime via an eyewitness ID, photos, and crime-scene evidence.
- Four search warrants were issued for Tyler's car, grandparents' residence, mother's residence, and girlfriend's residence; warrants sought firearms, evidentiary items, and venue items.
- Cell phone seized from Tyler’s car; gunlock seized from grandparents’ residence; Tyler signed a consent form to search the cell phone contents.
- District court denied suppression motions; trial admitted the challenged evidence; Tyler was convicted of murder and related firearm offense.
- On appeal, Tyler challenges the lawfulness of seizure, consent, and warrant particularity; the court affirms the convictions.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the cell phone was seized unlawfully. | Tyler—cell phone seized during unlawful arrest/search. | State—cell phone obtained under warrant-served search; not from arrest. | Cell phone obtained under warrant, not from arrest; not suppressed. |
| Whether Tyler voluntarily consented to the cell phone search. | Consent coerced or not voluntary. | Consent given voluntarily under totality of circumstances. | Consent voluntarily given; denial of suppression upheld. |
| Whether warrants were sufficiently particular. | Warrants too broad; impermissibly open-ended. | Warrants sufficiently particular; severable portions valid. | Warrant for firearm search sufficiently particular; severability applies; good-faith exception supports admission. |
| Whether the good-faith exception applies to the warrant execution. | Invalid portions taint all evidence. | Good faith reliance after mixed validity; not all evidence suppressed. | Good faith exception applies; suppression not required. |
| Whether the gunlock and cell phone evidence should be excluded due to warrant issues. | Evidence seized under possibly invalid portions. | Particular portion valid; severable; good faith supports admission. | Gunlock seizure upheld under valid portion; not suppressed. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. LeBron, 217 Neb. 452, 349 N.W.2d 918 (Neb. 1984) (severability of warrant provisions and partial suppression allowed)
- State v. Hedgcock, 289 Neb. 271, 854 N.W.2d 616 (Neb. 2014) (consent and good-faith considerations in search)
- State v. Henderson, 289 Neb. 271, 854 N.W.2d 616 (Neb. 2014) (good-faith exception and particularity analysis)
- State v. Osborn, 250 Neb. 57, 547 N.W.2d 139 (Neb. 1996) (implicit findings and review of suppression rulings)
- United States v. Fitzgerald, 724 F.2d 633 (8th Cir. 1983) (multifaceted approach to warrant validity and severability)
