History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Truitt
2011 Ohio 6599
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Aug. 14, 2008, altercation between Truitt and girlfriend Hooks; charges filed July 17, 2009 including rape, aggravated burglary, attempted rape, abduction, and assault; rape later dismissed.
  • Jury trial began June 29, 2010; State dismissed rape count; jury found Truitt guilty of aggravated burglary, abduction, and assault; attempted rape verdict could not be reached and was dismissed.
  • July 12, 2010, Truitt sentenced to eight years for aggravated burglary, five years for abduction, and six months for assault, all to be served concurrently.
  • Truitt timely appealed raising five assignments of error; the Ninth District rearranged assignments for review.
  • Court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands for proceedings on allied offenses issue under Johnson; other assignments are overruled.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Manifest weight for certain convictions Truitt (State) Truitt argues weight favors acquittal Convictions not against weight; affirmed for those counts
Admission of hearsay evidence Admission allowed under medical-treatment exception Hearsay error occurred Harmless error; affirmed on hearsay issue
DNA evidence admissibility Chain of custody and DNA testimony adequate Chain of custody gaps; low probative value Not an abuse of discretion; DNA evidence properly admitted
Admission of prior bad acts evidence Evidence relevant to motive/plan Prior acts prejudicial Not an abuse of discretion; admissible with cautionary instructions
Allied offenses and sentencing merge under Johnson Convictions may be allied offenses Johnson should apply; remand appropriate Remanded for Johnson-based merger determination; other errors affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Otten v. State, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (Ohio App.3d 1986) (evaluation of witness credibility and weight of conflicting evidence; standard for manifest weight)
  • Shue v. State, 97 Ohio App.3d 459 (Ohio App.3d 1994) (credibility and weight of witness testimony are for the factfinder)
  • Ostendorf-Morris Co. v. Slyman, 6 Ohio App.3d 46 (Ohio App.3d 1982) (credibility determinations belong to the trier of fact)
  • Crull v. Maple Park Bldg. Servs., 36 Ohio App.3d 153 (Ohio App.3d 1987) (limitations on appellate review of witness credibility)
  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314 (2010) (tests for allied offenses under merger rule; conduct-based analysis)
  • State v. Craig, 110 Ohio St.3d 306, 2006-Ohio-4571 (Supreme Court of Ohio 2006) (instructional guidance on admissibility and cautionary instructions)
  • State v. Tate, 2005-Ohio-2156 (Ohio appellate court 2005) (discusses harmless error and evidentiary weighing)
  • State v. Warren, 2011-Ohio-4886 (Ohio 11th Dist. 2011) (DNA evidence interpretation and probative value)
  • State v. Lanier, 2010-Ohio-6382 (Ohio 7th Dist. 2010) (Y-STR testing limitations; use for exclusion rather than identification)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Truitt
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 21, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 6599
Docket Number: 25527
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.