midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2020 Ohio 2736
Ohio Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Ronald L. Treadwell was indicted on possession and trafficking charges for heroin and fentanyl, plus firearm specifications; later pled guilty to trafficking in heroin (>100 grams) in exchange for dismissal of other counts.
  • Police used a confidential informant who purchased heroin at 318 S. Wayne Ave.; later a warrant search seized ~943.145 grams of heroin/fentanyl, drug paraphernalia, operable firearms, and $9,187.
  • At plea hearing prosecutor and court repeatedly informed Treadwell the sentence was a mandatory 11-year prison term; Treadwell acknowledged understanding and elected to plead guilty.
  • The trial court imposed an 11-year mandatory term and 5 years of post-release control; fines and costs were waived due to indigency.
  • Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief concluding the appeal was frivolous; no pro se brief was filed by appellant. The Tenth District independently reviewed the record and affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary under Crim.R. 11 Court substantially complied with Crim.R. 11; plea colloquy and acknowledgments show understanding Plea was not knowingly, intelligently, or voluntarily entered Plea valid — substantial compliance with Crim.R. 11; no prejudice shown
Whether the sentence was contrary to law Mandatory 11-year term was required by R.C. 2925.03 for >100g heroin; 5-year post-release control lawful Sentence unsupported or contrary to law Sentence lawful; record supports required findings and mandatory term
Whether the mandatory maximum sentence is cruel and unusual (Eighth Amendment) Statutory sentence within valid statute and not grossly disproportionate Mandatory 11-year maximum constitutes cruel and unusual punishment No Eighth Amendment violation; statutory sentence not shocking or disproportionate

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (standards for counsel to withdraw and appellate review for frivolousness)
  • Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988) (court must independently examine record when counsel seeks to withdraw under Anders)
  • State v. Griggs, 103 Ohio St.3d 85 (2004) (Crim.R. 11 substantial compliance standard for non-constitutional plea advisements)
  • State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516 (2016) (standard of review under R.C. 2953.08 for felony sentencing)
  • State v. Hairston, 118 Ohio St.3d 289 (2008) (general rule that lawful statutory sentences are not cruel and unusual)
  • State v. Weitbrecht, 86 Ohio St.3d 368 (1999) (Eighth Amendment disproportionality test)
  • McDougle v. Maxwell, 1 Ohio St.2d 68 (1964) (sentences within statutory limits generally not cruel and unusual)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Treadwell
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 30, 2020
Citations: 2020 Ohio 2736; 19AP-304
Docket Number: 19AP-304
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In