History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Travis C. Paige
169 A.3d 468
N.H.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • On Sept. 3, 2015, Travis C. Paige led police on a high-speed chase, driving over 100 mph, nearly hitting others, and crashing; he fled on foot and was arrested the next day.
  • Indicted for three counts of felony reckless conduct (vehicle alleged as deadly weapon); also charged by information with resisting arrest and disobeying an officer (misdemeanors).
  • State notified at or before arraignment that it would seek class A misdemeanor penalties for the two charged misdemeanors (resisting/disobeying) under RSA 625:9, IV(c)(2), but did not give such notice as to lesser-included misdemeanor reckless conduct.
  • Trial court instructed jury on felony reckless conduct and, over State objection, on lesser-included misdemeanor reckless conduct; jury acquitted felonies but convicted three counts of misdemeanor reckless conduct and the two misdemeanors.
  • At sentencing, trial court treated the lesser-included misdemeanor reckless conduct convictions as class A misdemeanors (twelve-month suspended sentences) rather than class B misdemeanors; Paige appealed arguing RSA 625:9, IV(c) required class B treatment absent pre-arraignment notice.

Issues

Issue State's Argument Paige's Argument Held
Whether RSA 625:9, IV(c)(2) required pre-arraignment notice for the State to obtain class A penalties for lesser-included unclassified misdemeanors when the defendant was charged with a felony Statute’s notice requirement does not apply to lesser-included misdemeanors that arise from felony charges; requiring notice would be redundant and serve no legislative purpose Absent the specified notice, unclassified misdemeanors are presumed class B misdemeanors under RSA 625:9, IV(c) and thus Paige’s convictions should be class B Affirmed: statute’s notice rule does not apply to lesser-included misdemeanors of felonies; convictions appropriately treated as class A misdemeanors in these circumstances

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Lathrop, 164 N.H. 468 (2012) (statutory interpretation principles and ascribing plain meanings)
  • Czyzewski v. N.H. Dep’t of Safety, 165 N.H. 109 (2013) (construction of statutes to promote justice)
  • State v. Burr, 147 N.H. 102 (2001) (avoidance of absurd or unjust statutory results)
  • State v. Bruce, 147 N.H. 37 (2001) (treatment of unclassified misdemeanors before 2009)
  • State v. Dansereau, 157 N.H. 596 (2008) (application of rule of lenity when statute ambiguous)
  • Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979) (right to appointed counsel where incarceration is possible)
  • Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) (right to counsel for indigent defendants)
  • State v. Weeks, 141 N.H. 248 (1996) (right to counsel principles in New Hampshire)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Travis C. Paige
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Aug 15, 2017
Citation: 169 A.3d 468
Docket Number: 2016-0342.
Court Abbreviation: N.H.