State v. Travis
2022 Ohio 1233
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2022Background
- On Sept. 25, 2020, Sierra Travis and her boyfriend Hiriam Frazier left an apartment complex after a brief visit; surveillance footage captured events in the parking lot.
- Travis retrieved a handgun from the rear passenger area of a shared rental Jeep, fired a “warning shot,” then walked around the car and shot Frazier in the chest.
- Frazier was transported to the hospital and died; autopsy listed cause of death as a gunshot wound and manner homicide.
- A grand jury indicted Travis on two murder counts and one felonious-assault count with firearm specifications; she waived a jury and elected a bench trial.
- At trial Travis testified she acted in self-defense (and alternatively that the shooting was accidental); the state introduced surveillance, witness testimony, and forensic evidence.
- The trial court rejected accident and self-defense theories, found Travis guilty on all counts, and sentenced her to an aggregate 18 years to life; the court of appeals affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court erred by not considering accident / providing accident instruction | State: court considered accident and explicitly referenced accident instruction language; no legal requirement to further explain in a bench trial | Travis: court failed to consider accident and should have instructed on it | Court: overruled — bench-trial presumption that the court applied the law; court cited accident instruction language and reasonably rejected accident theory |
| Whether the court should have instructed on or convicted of lesser included offense of reckless homicide | State: bench court is presumed to have considered lesser-included offenses; evidence supported murder | Travis: requested reckless-homicide instruction and argues conviction should have been on lesser offense | Court: overruled — presumption that bench court considered lesser included offenses and evidence supported murder |
| Whether Travis was entitled to acquittal on self-defense grounds | State: evidence (surveillance, witnesses) disproved self-defense; Travis created the situation and used excessive force | Travis: claimed she fired in response to being confronted and advanced upon; alternative claim of accidental discharge | Court: overruled — court found surveillance and testimony undermined self-defense, and trial court did not lose its way in making credibility findings |
Key Cases Cited
- Walker v. State, 26 Ohio App.3d 29 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985) (bench-trial general-finding requirement under Crim.R. 23(C))
- Thompkins v. Ohio, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (standard for reversing convictions as against the manifest weight of the evidence)
