State v. Thomas
2017 Ohio 7520
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Trenex Thomas was indicted in Ohio for failing to verify his residence (R.C. 2950.06) and failing to notify the sheriff of an address change (R.C. 2950.05) in March 2016; both third-degree felonies.
- Thomas had been adjudicated a delinquent juvenile in Cooke County, Illinois, in 2000 for aggravated criminal sexual assault and was ordered to register as a sex offender; he first registered in Ohio in 2010.
- Thomas moved to dismiss, arguing Illinois law imposed only a 10-year registration duty that expired in 2010, so he had no continuing Ohio registration obligation.
- The trial court denied the motion, relying on the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in In re J.W., which treated a juvenile adjudication for aggravated criminal sexual assault as a sexual-predator classification carrying a lifetime registration duty.
- Thomas pleaded no contest to failure to verify in exchange for dismissal of the other count; the court accepted the plea and initially imposed community control (later revoked and converted to prison time).
- Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief concluding no arguable issues; the appellate court conducted an independent Anders review and affirmed the conviction as frivolous on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Illinois juvenile adjudication imposed only a 10‑year registration duty, relieving Thomas of Ohio registration duties | Illinois law (per State) requires lifetime registration for juveniles adjudicated of aggravated criminal sexual assault (In re J.W. controls) | Thomas argued Illinois imposed only a 10‑year duty that expired in 2010, so Ohio registration obligations no longer applied | Court held Illinois law, as interpreted in In re J.W., imposed a lifetime duty; trial court correctly denied dismissal |
| Whether there are any meritorious appellate issues after plea and sentencing | State contended proceedings and plea colloquy complied with law; no reversible error shown | Thomas (via counsel) asserted no nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal | Court found no issues of arguable merit under Anders and affirmed judgment |
Key Cases Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (requires counsel who finds appeal frivolous to file brief and court to conduct independent review)
- In re J.W., 204 Ill.2d 50 (2003) (Illinois Supreme Court: juvenile adjudication for aggravated criminal sexual assault constitutes sexual‑predator classification and requires lifetime registration)
