History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Thomas
2015 Ohio 4121
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Michael Thomas was indicted on Trafficking in Heroin (1st-degree felony) and Possession of Heroin (2nd-degree felony).
  • Thomas moved to suppress evidence, arguing an unlawful search and seizure by his parole officer.
  • The trial court held a suppression hearing and denied Thomas’s motion to suppress.
  • The State dismissed the trafficking count; Thomas pled guilty to possession and was sentenced to six years, consecutive to another case.
  • Thomas appealed, challenging the denial of his suppression motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress State: denial was proper (no further argument summarized) Thomas: parole officer lacked reasonable grounds for search, so evidence should be suppressed Not preserved for appeal because Thomas pled guilty; overruled on the merits as not plain error because Thomas was not prejudiced

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mammone, 13 N.E.3d 1051 (Ohio 2014) (plain-error standard requires showing error, obviousness, and that outcome would clearly have been different)
  • State v. Phillips, 75 Ohio App.3d 785 (2d Dist. 1992) (suppression ruling harmless where the challenged evidence was not admitted and conviction rested on a plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Thomas
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 2, 2015
Citation: 2015 Ohio 4121
Docket Number: 2014-CA-141
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.