State v. Thacker
286 Neb. 16
| Neb. | 2013Background
- Thackers moved to Farnam, Nebraska, in 2011 and did not obtain state recognition for homeschooling until October 2011.
- Public school calendar year began August 17, 2011; Thackers did not enroll children in a recognized school before recognition.
- County court convicted both parents of five misdemeanor counts under § 79-201 for the period Aug 17–Oct 4, 2011.
- District court reversed, holding that exemption procedures and calendar-year timing did not force enrollment in a recognized school before exemption.
- State appeals under § 29-2315.01; the issue is whether § 79-201 requires attendance at a recognized school before exemption is effective and how hours must be completed.
- Court concludes that exemption timing and start-of-year rules do not criminalize Thackers’ actions in the first year and remands for vacatur of convictions.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether § 79-201 requires attendance at a recognized school until exemption is effective | Thackers: only attendance when exempt school in session and minimum hours by year-end. | State: children must attend a legally recognized school each day of the calendar year until exemption recognized. | Thackers win; not required to enroll daily before exempt status is recognized. |
| Whether § 79-1601(3) fixes the effective date of an exemption upon receipt of the notarized statement | Thackers: effective date not clearly tied to receipt; governing statutes control. | State: effective date upon Department receipt of notice. | Ambiguity resolved in favor of Thackers; not plainly fixed by receipt rule. |
| Whether the evidence supports convictions or the district court properly vacated them | State: convictions supported by statutory requirements. | Thackers could complete minimum hours within the school year. | Convictions vacated and remanded; exemptions could satisfy hours requirement. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ramirez, 285 Neb. 203 (2013) (statutory interpretation and standard of review cited for law questions)
- State v. Bree, 285 Neb. 520 (2013) (statutory construction principles applied to penal statutes)
- State v. McCarthy, 284 Neb. 572 (2012) (strict construction of penal statutes; no adding missing terms)
