History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. TAKYI
314 Ga. App. 444
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Takyi was arrested for DUI on Oct. 3, 2008; charges were brought in Fulton County on Feb. 4, 2010 and Feb. 22, 2010 after transfer from municipal court; 18-month delay between arrest and trial led to a speedy-trial dismissal in April 2010; trial court applied Barker and Doggett balancing and found a violation; court relied in part on hearsay and improper evidence to weigh prejudice; appellate court vacated and remanded for proper factual findings and legal analysis; decision remanded for new, adequately supported order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether delay was presumptively prejudicial Takyi State Yes, delay presumptively prejudicial.
Whether four Barker factors properly balanced Takyi's right was jeopardized by long delay and some prejudice State Remand needed due to errors in how factors weighed and evidence used.
Whether hearsay and improper testimony supported prejudice finding Takyi State Hearsay improperly relied on; prejudice factor flawed.
Whether dismissal was proper remedy or remand needed Takyi State Remanded to reinstate proper balancing with correct findings.

Key Cases Cited

  • Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) (two-stage speedy-trial inquiry; presumptively prejudicial period and four-factor balance)
  • Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992) (delays long enough to be presumptively prejudicial; four-factor test framework)
  • Porter v. State, 288 Ga. 524 (2011) (Ga. speedy-trial balancing; abuse-of-discretion review)
  • Jones v. State, 284 Ga. 320 (2008) (hearsay and non-testifying witnesses cannot support harm findings)
  • Reimers v. State, 310 Ga.App. 887 (2011) (appellate remand for proper Barker analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. TAKYI
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 29, 2012
Citation: 314 Ga. App. 444
Docket Number: A11A2103
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.