State v. T. Roberts
DA 21-0513
Mont.Aug 27, 2024Background
- Terrance Anthony Roberts was convicted by a jury of Attempted Kidnapping and Obstructing a Peace Officer in Missoula County, Montana.
- The case involved Roberts' interaction with a minor, Z.S., where he forcibly grabbed her arm and told her "You're coming with me," after she tried to disengage.
- Roberts fled from a uniformed police officer (Officer Puddy) who, after responding to a call, attempted to detain him regarding the incident with Z.S.
- At trial, Roberts did not dispute much of Z.S.'s account but argued he should have been charged with a lesser crime (unlawful restraint) due to lack of kidnapping intent.
- On appeal, Roberts raised concerns about jury instructions, evidentiary admission of a police body cam video, the requirement to register as a sexual offender, and an erroneously imposed presentence investigation (PSI) fee.
Issues
| Issue | Roberts' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incorrect mental state jury instruction ("knowingly") on obstruction charge | The jury was misinstructed, amounting to a manifest miscarriage of justice. | Error was harmless; evidence was overwhelming. | Incorrect instruction, but no prejudice; conviction affirmed. |
| Jury instructions on "force" and "liberty" (attempted kidnapping/unlawful restraint) | Instructions were confusing and prejudicial, undermining the jury's ability to decide. | Definitions, while not perfect, were adequate and not prejudicial. | Slightly confusing, but not prejudicial; conviction stands. |
| Admission of police body camera video | The video was hearsay and its admission prejudiced the defense. | Evidence was cumulative, admissible, or, if error, harmless. | Admission was, at most, harmless error. |
| Requirement to register as a sexual offender | Unlawful and not warranted by the facts. | Statutorily mandated where the victim is a minor and the offense is kidnapping. | Registration requirement was legal and within statutory mandate. |
| Imposition of $50 PSI fee | Improper, as it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. | Conceded error; fee should not have been imposed. | Remanded to remove PSI fee from judgment. |
Key Cases Cited
- TCF Enters., Inc. v. Rames, Inc., 415 Mont. 306 (2024) (standard for reviewing jury instructions and prejudice requirement)
- State v. Bennett, 408 Mont. 209 (2022) (correct mental state required for obstruction of a peace officer)
- State v. Smith, 404 Mont. 245 (2021) (harmless error for evidentiary admissions)
- State v. Pine, 413 Mont. 254 (2023) (limits on appellate review of sentencing and legality of sexual offender registry requirements)
- State v. Secrease, 405 Mont. 229 (2021) (ineffective assistance of counsel standard)
- State v. Kotwicki, 335 Mont. 344 (2007) (legality of sentencing and registry requirements)
